Who Does What in a Child Nutrition Baseline?
The Tribal Development Office in a Wayanad panchayat has six weeks and a budget of ₹1.2 lakh to produce a baseline on undernutrition among children aged 6–59 months in three hamlets. The team includes one social anthropologist, one biological anthropologist, one archaeologist, two untrained interns and one vehicle. The officer wants a single food-frequency survey of 180 households and asks why anthropologists are needed at all. The biological anthropologist proposes weight, height, mid-upper arm circumference and haemoglobin screening, but there is no laboratory and only a portable stadiometer. The social anthropologist wants 20 household case studies on food taboos, care work and entitlement. The archaeologist suggests mapping old settlement sites. Interns have four days of training. A local health worker warns that two hamlets have refused surveys before and that the festival season will reduce availability. The student coordinator must allocate tasks, defend the design and set one non-negotiable ethical rule.
1. Allocate the six-week study's components to the most relevant anthropological branches and justify each allocation. What should the archaeologist do?
Read the worked answer
Biological anthropology owns the anthropometric and haemoglobin component: standardised weight, height, MUAC and age-sex z-scores need training, calibration and a referral protocol. Social anthropology owns the 20 household case studies: food taboos, who controls the grain, care work and access to the ration shop are not captured by a food-frequency schedule. The archaeologist should not excavate or map settlement sites; with six weeks and no laboratory, that would divert the vehicle and interns from the baseline. At most, the archaeologist can compile existing published site information for background. Holism here means linking measurements to meanings and institutions, not using every branch. Interns can do anthropometry only after four days of training and a reliability check; otherwise they should assist with scheduling and consent. This allocation protects data quality and answers the officer's question: bodies and meals alone cannot explain why two hamlets refuse surveys.
2. The officer says: 'If we measure bodies and count meals, why interview anyone?' Write a response using the concept of holism and at least two specific variables from the setup.
Read the worked answer
The officer's plan treats undernutrition as a meal-count problem. Holism would ask why measured wasting can coexist with adequate food availability. Two specific variables: first, food taboos during illness or pregnancy may withhold protein from a child even when the household has food; second, care work and festival season may change feeding frequency and the mother's time. A food-frequency survey can record what was eaten but not who decided, who was absent, or whether a health worker's advice conflicted with a taboo. Combining MUAC and haemoglobin with case studies lets the team test whether a statistical association is explained by a stated rule or by income. It also prevents a false recommendation-for example, a food distribution programme when the binding constraint is a taboo or a referral failure. The 180 households are for prevalence; the 20 cases are for mechanism, not representativeness.
3. State one non-negotiable ethical rule and explain how it would change the fieldwork plan.
Read the worked answer
Non-negotiable: no haemoglobin or anthropometric measurement without individual informed consent and a written referral pathway for any child found severely wasted or severely anaemic. In practice this changes the plan: the team must train interns on consent in the local language, pair a health worker with each measurement session, and budget time and vehicle use for referrals. It also means the survey cannot be anonymous in the same way as a questionnaire-measurement data must be linked to a child for follow-up, then de-identified for analysis. If the two refusing hamlets will not consent, the team must report that limitation rather than sample around it. The ethical rule is not a formality; it determines whether the baseline is usable and whether the team has a duty of care.