The Dropout Survey in a Tribal Hamlet
You are an MSW student doing a field study on school dropout in a tribal hamlet in Wayanad. The hamlet has 45 households and 22 children aged 6 to 14. The school register shows 6 dropouts, but your household visits suggest 9 children have been absent for more than 60 days. The local teacher, a key informant, asks you to report 'only 4 dropouts' because a higher figure will affect the school's grade. Your field supervisor is on leave. A panchayat member offers to fill 10 questionnaires himself. You have five days left, a target of 30 households, 26 household interviews completed, and 4 households are locked.
1. Critically examine the data problem: how should 'dropout' be defined, and what sampling and measurement errors are present?
Read the worked answer
Definition. 'Dropout' means a child who was enrolled and has left school for the rest of the school year, not merely a child who is absent. A child absent for more than 60 days may be at risk but is not necessarily a dropout. The teacher's figure of 6 and the household figure of 9 are measuring different things. I would use UDISE+ definitions and a cohort approach: of the 22 children enrolled at the start, how many are currently attending, how many have transferred, and how many have stopped.
Sampling and measurement errors. The target is 30 of 45 households; 26 are completed and 4 are locked, so the achieved sample is 26 unless replacements are chosen. Replacement can bias the estimate if locked households differ - for example, migrant labour households. School records may be outdated, and teacher reports are subject to social desirability because enrolment figures affect the school's grade. Household self-reports may under-report absence. I would triangulate school registers, household interviews and Anganwadi or panchayat data, and report a range rather than a single figure. I would also record age, gender, community, distance to school and reason for absence.
2. The teacher asks you to report 4 dropouts and the panchayat member offers to fill questionnaires. How would you respond, and what would you do about the 4 locked households?
Read the worked answer
Teacher's request. I would not alter the figure. Reporting 4 when the evidence shows more would be fabrication and would mislead the panchayat and the department. I would explain that the study's value depends on accuracy, that the school's grade is not a reason to suppress data, and that the report will separate 'confirmed dropouts' from 'at risk of dropping out'. I would offer the teacher a chance to comment on the draft and to add school-level explanations.
Panchayat member's offer. I would decline to let him fill questionnaires. Data must be collected by the researcher or a trained enumerator; otherwise consent, confidentiality and validity are compromised. I would thank him and ask him only to introduce the team.
Locked households. I would revisit at different times - early morning, evening and weekend - with a female community guide, leave a contact slip and seek consent. If they remain unavailable, I would report them as non-response and adjust the denominator. With five days left, I would consolidate the 26 completed households, add four purposive interviews with teachers or mothers, and state the limitation clearly. I would inform my supervisor and, if pressure continues, the institutional ethics committee.