One Rule for Three Grammar Items? Bahuvrīhi, Visarga Sandhi, Karmadhāraya
During a grammar clinic, a candidate is correcting her answer script. She had to split the compound in “cakrapāṇiḥ viṣṇuḥ śaṅkhaṃ dadhāti” and name the samāsa. She wrote “cakrasya pāṇiḥ” and called it a tatpuruṣa. The teacher marks it wrong but the candidate argues that the meaning is “the hand of the discus.” A second item asks her to split “rāmo’pi” and she writes “rāmaḥ + api” but cannot explain the visarga change. A third item contains “nīlotpalaṃ sarasi vikasati,” which she calls a bahuvrīhi because “blue lotus” describes a lotus. The candidate has 12 minutes and three items; she wants a rule she can apply to all three rather than memorising each answer. She also has to write one sentence explaining why “cakrapāṇiḥ” is a bahuvrīhi even though the English gloss looks possessive. Her teacher has warned that examiners award the mark for the test, not for the label alone.
1. Split “cakrapāṇiḥ” and explain why it is bahuvrīhi, not tatpuruṣa. Give the meaning of the compound and the sentence.
Read the worked answer
Split: cakra + pāṇi, with the whole compound referring to Viṣṇu. It is bahuvrīhi because the compound denotes a person characterised by the discus-hand, not a hand that belongs to a discus. The test is the question: does the compound name the thing denoted by its second member, or does it point to someone else who possesses it? Here ‘cakrapāṇiḥ’ points to Viṣṇu; the pāṇi is his. ‘Cakrasya pāṇiḥ’ would be a tatpuruṣa meaning ‘the hand of the discus’, which is not the sentence’s sense. In ‘cakrapāṇiḥ viṣṇuḥ śaṅkhaṃ dadhāti’, the compound is nominative singular and agrees with Viṣṇu. The English gloss ‘discus-handed’ looks possessive, but possession is exactly what bahuvrīhi expresses.
2. Split “rāmo’pi” and explain the sandhi in one sentence.
Read the worked answer
rāmaḥ + api → rāmo’pi. The visarga after a becomes o before a voiced sound; here the following word begins with a, so the initial a of api is elided and the elision is marked by avagraha (’). It is not ‘rāmaḥ api’ unchanged, and it is not a compound. The candidate should state the rule and show the arrow, because the examiner is testing the change, not just the final form.
3. In “nīlotpalaṃ sarasi vikasati”, is “nīlotpalaṃ” bahuvrīhi? Explain the test that decides.
Read the worked answer
No. In ‘nīlotpalaṃ sarasi vikasati’, the compound denotes the lotus itself: nīla + utpala, a karmadhāraya with a qualifying first member. The sentence says the blue lotus blooms in the lake; the head is utpala. Bahuvrīhi would be used if the compound described something else as possessing a blue lotus, for example a lake ‘nīlotpalaṃ’ meaning ‘having blue lotuses’. The test is whether the compound is the name of the thing or an adjective pointing to another possessor. Here it is the subject, so karmadhāraya is the accurate label.