Who Decides the Road? A Gram Panchayat, an MLA and a Tied Grant
A gram panchayat in Uttara Kannada has 18 elected members, 7 women. It receives Rs 25 lakh from the 15th Finance Commission tied grant for drinking water and Rs 8 lakh from MGNREGA for a road. The MLA tells the PDO to give the road contract to a party supporter without a tender; the PDO says a resolution and social audit are needed. The panchayat president calls a meeting; 11 members attend. A local NGO asks for the minutes. The road is needed before the monsoon; the water supply scheme is half-built. The state has not issued a clarification on the grant. The panchayat's bank account has not been audited for two years, and the PDO has the only cheque book.
1. Which body has the constitutional authority to decide how the Rs 25 lakh tied grant is used, and what limits that authority?
Read the worked answer
The gram panchayat has the constitutional authority because the 73rd Amendment makes it an institution of self-government and the Eleventh Schedule lists drinking water among its functions. The grant is 'tied', so the panchayat must use it for the purpose set by the Finance Commission; it cannot divert it to the road. Its authority is also limited by procedure: a quorum-based meeting, a resolution, a technical estimate, and a social audit. The state government can issue guidelines and audit, but it cannot let the MLA spend the money directly. The PDO's insistence on a resolution and social audit is therefore correct.
2. Evaluate the MLA's instruction to give the contract to a party supporter without a tender.
Read the worked answer
The instruction is not legitimate. An MLA has no executive power over panchayat funds; the MLA's role is to represent constituents and to raise issues in the legislature. Directing a contract to a party supporter without tender or resolution converts a public grant into patronage and violates the panchayat's accounting and audit rules. It also creates a conflict with the tied purpose of the water grant. Even if the road is urgent, urgency does not remove the need for an estimate, a resolution and a social audit. The panchayat should record the MLA's suggestion in the minutes and reject it, while inviting the MLA to support the drinking-water scheme through the proper channel.
3. The road is needed before the monsoon and only 11 of 18 members attend the meeting. What should the panchayat do next?
Read the worked answer
Eleven members are more than half of 18, so the meeting is likely to have quorum; the secretary should confirm the exact rule, but a majority attendance is hard to challenge. The minutes should record who attended and the resolution. The panchayat should separate the two funds: use the MGNREGA money for the road only after a works estimate, a resolution and a muster-roll plan, and keep the Rs 25 lakh for drinking water. It should publish the minutes and the social audit notice within the required time. If the road cannot be completed before the monsoon, the panchayat should prioritise a safe temporary crossing rather than bypass procedure. The NGO should be given the minutes, not denied them.