A Free Seat, a Long Bus Ride: A Family Decides on a Daughter's College
In a village 40 km from Mysuru, a 16-year-old girl has scored 92% in SSLC. She has a free seat in a government residential PU college with hostel; the family is a landless labour household earning about Rs 9,000 a month. Her mother works as a farm labourer; her grandmother says girls should not live away from home and that the family will lose her wages. Two neighbours say the hostel is “not safe”; a self-help group offers a Rs 5,000 loan for books and travel. The girl wants to study science; her father is willing but worried about marriage prospects. The admission deadline is in 10 days. The college is the only one in the taluk with a science section and a girls' hostel.
1. Identify the main social and economic factors in this family's decision, and separate them.
Read the worked answer
Economic factors: the household earns about Rs 9,000 a month from labour; sending the girl to a hostel removes some of her paid work and adds travel and book costs, though the seat and hostel are free. Social factors: the grandmother's view that girls should not live away from home, neighbours' claim that the hostel is 'not safe', and the father's worry about marriage prospects. These interact: a fear about safety becomes an economic argument about lost wages. Separating them matters because the free seat and hostel reduce the economic cost sharply, while the social objections are beliefs that can be tested with information rather than accepted as fixed.
2. Which statements in the setup are evidence and which are opinion? How should the family test the opinion?
Read the worked answer
Evidence: the 92% score, the free seat and hostel, the 40 km distance, the household income, the Rs 5,000 SHG loan offer, and the 10-day deadline. Opinion: 'girls should not live away from home', 'the hostel is not safe', and the assumption about marriage prospects. The safety claim is partly testable: the family can visit the hostel, ask the warden for the visitor and leave rules, speak to current students' parents, and check whether the college has a grievance register. The marriage claim is a social prediction, not a fact. Testing opinions does not guarantee agreement, but it stops an untested fear from deciding the issue.
3. Recommend a decision to the family, with two safeguards. Justify it using the factors you identified.
Read the worked answer
The family should accept the free seat, because the economic cost is low and the long-term return to the girl and the household is high; the 92% score shows she can use the opportunity. Safeguards: first, use the SHG loan for books and travel only after a written repayment plan from the household's income, so the loan does not become a new burden. Second, arrange a hostel visit and a named local guardian, and agree on monthly home visits, which answers the safety concern with a check rather than a prohibition. The grandmother's objection should be heard, but it should not outweigh the girl's own stated wish and the evidence of the free seat.