The Kolhapur Society That Suspended Its New Members' Votes
Shivneri Bahuuddeshiya Sahakari Sanstha Ltd in Kolhapur has 900 members, a milk chilling plant and a small cattle-feed unit. In 2022-23 it received a ₹50 lakh grant from the state dairy development scheme, on condition that the plant run for at least five years and submit utilisation certificates. At the last board meeting, five decisions were taken. First, the membership fee was raised from ₹500 to ₹25,000, described by the chairman as a way 'to keep out people who cannot contribute'. Second, 40 families from a hamlet outside the village were admitted but told their voting rights would stay suspended for five years. Third, the year's surplus of ₹12 lakh was distributed as 20% dividend on share capital, with nothing transferred to the reserve fund. Fourth, the society affiliated itself to a political party and sanctioned a ₹2 lakh donation from its funds. Fifth, the board refused to send any member to the district co-operative training programme in order to save the fees.
1. Identify which co-operative principles each decision violates, explaining the principle and its application rather than merely naming it.
Read the worked answer
1. Membership fee of ₹25,000 - open and voluntary membership. A co-operative is open to all persons able to use its services and willing to accept the responsibilities of membership, without artificial barriers. A fee 50 times the old one is not a subscription; it is a filter designed to exclude small and marginal farmers, and it converts membership into a purchase. Membership fees must be nominal, laid down in the bye-laws and approved by the general body.
2. Suspended voting rights for the 40 families - democratic member control. One member, one vote is the constitutional core of a co-operative and cannot be bargained away at admission. If the bye-laws permit a probation period at all, it cannot extend to a five-year denial of the vote; that makes the new members second-class owners. The condition is void.
3. Dividend of 20% with no reserve transfer - member economic participation. Surplus belongs to members, but it must first build indivisible reserves and be used for member benefit in proportion to patronage. The statutory reserve transfer (at least 25% of net profit under the MCS Act) is mandatory, and dividend on capital is capped by the bye-laws and the Registrar's limits; 20% with a nil reserve fund is both improper and financially imprudent.
4. Political affiliation and donation - autonomy and independence. Co-operatives are autonomous, self-help organisations controlled by members. Contributions to a political party from society funds are outside the objects, breach political neutrality and expose the society to loss of state grant support.
5. Refusal of training - education, training and information. Members and employees must be educated so they can contribute effectively; the board's 'saving' is a direct breach of this principle and weakens the very governance the society needs.
2. The board now asks you to restructure the ₹12 lakh surplus. Draft an appropriation with reasons, and state how the two membership decisions should be corrected.
Read the worked answer
Correction first. The ₹25,000 fee must be brought back to a nominal amount by bye-law amendment in a general body meeting, with existing members' admission fees refunded or adjusted; this requires the Registrar's approval of the amendment. The 40 families must be given full voting rights from the date of admission - the resolution is void, and they may approach the Registrar for relief.
Appropriation of ₹12 lakh (illustrative, to be confirmed against the audited figure and bye-laws):
| Head | Amount | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve fund | ₹3,00,000 (25%) | Mandatory statutory transfer; builds an indivisible corpus |
| Member education and training fund | ₹1,00,000 | Restores the principle the board breached; funds training |
| Provision for plant maintenance and depreciation | ₹2,50,000 | The chilling plant must still be operating in year five of the grant condition |
| General body-approved infrastructure (feed unit repairs) | ₹2,00,000 | Member-benefit use of surplus |
| Patronage-based refund / price support to suppliers | ₹3,00,000 | Surplus returns to members in proportion to use, not to capital |
| Dividend on capital | ₹50,000 at a modest, bye-law permitted rate | Capital is rewarded last and modestly |
Logic: reserve and member benefit first, dividend last. A society that has just raised a grant of ₹50 lakh cannot justify distributing cash while its reserve is ₹2 lakh.
The ₹2 lakh donation must be withdrawn; the recipient is not a society object and the general body's ratification cannot make an ultra vires expenditure valid.
3. A director argues that since the government gave ₹50 lakh, the board must follow whatever the department suggests, including holding back the new members' votes to keep a stable board. Advise the society.
Read the worked answer
Receiving state aid does not transfer control. The seventh co-operative principle is autonomy and independence, and the MCS Act preserves member supremacy within the legal framework. Government money buys compliance with the scheme's written conditions - the five-year operation period, utilisation certificates, maintenance of separate accounts, and audit - not directors' allegiance to a department's advice on who may vote.
Distinguish conditions from pressure. Conditions in the sanction order must be complied with as a contractual obligation; informal suggestions about internal governance carry no legal force. If the board obeys an informal suggestion that breaches the Act and the bye-laws, the liability lies with the board, not the official.
Practical steps. (1) Ask the department to record any governance condition in writing; if it is not in the sanction order, treat it as advice. (2) Keep the grant in a separate heading with its own utilisation certificates so the plant's finances are auditable. (3) Restore the new members' voting rights to remove any suggestion that the grant is being used to distort the membership. (4) Place the whole sequence in the minutes and before the general body. (5) Keep the political affiliation and donation decision revoked - it is the clearest threat to the grant, since state schemes are closed to bodies that are politically aligned.
Bottom line: obey the sanction order, ignore informal direction on voting, and let the members control the society.