Maharashtra HSC GFC study materials
Maharashtra HSC GFC study resources

Debris slide on a ghat road cut into laterite-capped basalt

Maharashtra HSC GFC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Debris slide on a ghat road cut into laterite-capped basalt

A 4.2 km ghat section of a State Highway in Satara district is cut into weathered Deccan basalt capped by 3-6 m of laterite. The 35 m high cut slope stands at about 55 degrees and is the only all-weather link for 14 villages. In the last week of July, 410 mm of rain fell in 72 hours. A debris slide of roughly 6,000 cubic metres buried 40 m of carriageway, blocked the culvert at the toe, and left a spring flowing from the slope 12 m above road level. Two proposals are on the table. P1: a 9 m RCC toe wall costing about 1 crore rupees. P2: re-grading the slope to 1:1.5 with 3 m benches, a 1.5 m deep cut-off drain above the crest, horizontal drains, gabion toe protection and grass-legume cover, costing about 2.4 crore. The Division has funds this year only for P1.

1. Explain the mechanism of this slide. Why did it occur on this slope after this particular rainfall event?

Read the worked answer

The slide is a translational debris slide along the laterite-weathered basalt contact, driven by a rise in pore-water pressure.

The evidence fits that reading. Laterite is permeable and the weathered basalt beneath it is much less so, so infiltrating rain builds a perched water table at the contact, which is a preferred slip plane. A 55 degree cut is far steeper than the stable angle for weathered material, which is closer to 1:1.5, so the slope was already at limiting equilibrium. The blocked culvert removed toe support and allowed water to stand at the foot of the slope.

The rainfall figure matters as much as the total: 410 mm over 72 hours is long enough for deep infiltration rather than pure surface runoff, so pore pressure rose through the whole laterite profile. The spring emerging 12 m above road level is direct evidence of a seepage line, and the slide occurred where that seepage exits.

The lesson is that the trigger was water, not the weight of the rock alone; any remedial design that does not lower the water table will fail.

2. Which proposal should be adopted, and how would you phase it given the budget?

Read the worked answer

Adopt P2, but phase it rather than waiting for the full 2.4 crore.

The key argument is that a toe wall alone does not remove the cause. P1 adds weight at the foot of an already steep slope but leaves the perched water table untouched, so pore pressure keeps building behind the wall. The slip plane sits well above the toe, so the wall may simply be bypassed; and if it is founded on the same weathered material it will itself be undercut.

P2 attacks the water first (cut-off drain, horizontal drains) and reduces the driving geometry second (benching, re-grading) and only then adds toe support.

Phasing:

  • Year 1, before next monsoon: clear and re-line the culvert, cut the intercepting drain above the crest, install horizontal drains at the seepage line, seal cracks, place a temporary gabion toe, and remove material from the top of the slide mass to reduce load.
  • Year 2: full benching and re-grading, permanent toe structure and bio-engineering cover.

The 1.4 crore extra is smaller than the cost of one more road closure plus the risk to 14 villages, but this must be argued explicitly to the sanctioning authority rather than assumed.

3. Design a monsoon monitoring and closure protocol for this section.

Read the worked answer

Monitoring should be tied to a decision rule, not left to informal patrol judgement.

Instruments: vibrating-wire piezometers at three depths in the slide mass and one stable reference borehole, read weekly in the dry season and daily in monsoon; inclinometer casing through the slip plane to detect shear movement before it reaches the surface; crack pins across the road and on the slope face; and a tipping-bucket rain gauge on site.

Trigger thresholds: for example, a three-day cumulative rainfall of 250 mm, or any crack widening of more than 5 mm in 24 hours, or a piezometric rise of 1 m in a week, puts the section on alert; exceedance of any two closes the road to traffic.

Operational steps: a named duty officer, pre-positioned barricades and diversion signage, a register signed at each inspection, and a stockpile of gabion mesh and sandbags at the section during June to September.

Also enforce a standing restriction against any new toe loading, spoil dumping or construction on the slope, since these are the common causes of re-activation.