Reading a Dying Urban Lake: Oxygen, Algae and a Fish-Stocking Proposal
A 46-hectare lake on the edge of a class-B city receives about 12 million litres a day of untreated sewage from three nullahs. In the third week of May, monitoring records dissolved oxygen at 2.1 mg per litre, biochemical oxygen demand at 18 mg per litre, and a dense green surface scum dominated by Microcystis. Four hundred fish have died, and three children who entered the water during a festival developed vomiting and skin irritation. The municipal corporation's sewage treatment plant, designed for 20 MLD, runs at 55% of capacity because one clarifier has been broken since 2022; its pollution-board consent was last renewed in 2019. The corporation proposes to stock 20,000 Nile tilapia at a cost of ₹18 lakh to graze the algae, and to fence the lake. The lake is not notified as a wetland, and the nullahs have never been sampled for industrial effluent.
1. Diagnose the lake's condition. Which measurements matter most, and what do they tell you about the cause?
Read the worked answer
The two decisive numbers are dissolved oxygen at 2.1 mg/l and BOD at 18 mg/l. Together they show a large, continuous load of biodegradable organic matter and an oxygen demand far beyond what the water body can re-aerate; fish kills become likely below about 3–4 mg/l.
The Microcystis bloom is a symptom, not the cause. Cyanobacteria dominate when nitrogen and phosphorus are abundant, the water is warm and stratified, and grazing pressure on other algae is low. The bloom then does its own damage: it collapses at night and drives oxygen down further, and Microcystis produces microcystins, which fit the children's vomiting and skin irritation after contact far better than a bacterial spike alone would.
The 12 MLD inflow against a 20 MLD plant running at 55% (about 11 MLD treated) makes the plant's shortfall the proximate cause. The 2019 consent renewal is secondary but fixes the legal duty.
Missing, and needed before any remedy is designed: total phosphorus and ammonia to confirm the nutrient source; chlorophyll-a to quantify the bloom; faecal coliform for the health risk; and nullah sampling to check whether industrial effluent is mixed in. Without those, any remedy is guesswork.
2. Evaluate the corporation's proposal to stock 20,000 Nile tilapia to graze the algae.
Read the worked answer
Reject it, on four grounds.
Causation. The algae are feeding on nutrients that continue to arrive at 12 MLD. Removing some algae does not remove the load; the bloom returns within weeks. The fish become another trophic layer, not a treatment process.
Biology. Nile tilapia is an omnivorous generalist. It grazes plankton but also detritus and benthic material, and its feeding and nesting stir sediment, raising turbidity and releasing sediment-bound phosphorus back into the water column - the opposite of the stated aim. It does not reliably consume colonial cyanobacteria and may avoid them.
Ecology. Tilapia is already established in Indian waters, but deliberate stocking in a lake not managed for aquaculture is still an introduction. It competes with native fish, and once introduced it cannot be recalled. A lake already stressed is the worst place to add a competitor.
Method. Twenty thousand fish is an arbitrary density with no baseline, no control and no monitoring plan; nobody has said who monitors or what would count as failure.
If biological control is wanted later, it should follow nutrient reduction, use native filter-feeding species, be preceded by a fishery assessment, and carry a monitoring and removal plan.
3. What should the corporation be required to do first, and under which instruments?
Read the worked answer
The instruments already exist; the sequence should be enforced before any cosmetic measure.
Instruments. (i) Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - the corporation operates the plant under a consent that lapsed in 2019; the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board can refuse or condition consent and issue directions under Section 33A, including closure or supply cut-off. (ii) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the sewage-related rules. (iii) The National Green Tribunal, which has repeatedly ordered remediation of polluted urban lakes with timelines and takes original jurisdiction over such matters. (iv) If the lake is later notified, the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 apply and the state wetland authority should assess it.
Sequence. Repair the clarifier and restore 20 MLD capacity against a dated milestone; intercept and treat the three nullahs; add tertiary treatment or a constructed wetland before discharge; desilt and remove accumulated sludge; then re-aerate or install floating wetlands if oxygen stays low; then monitor DO, BOD, phosphorus and chlorophyll monthly for two years and publish the data.
Fencing and fish come last, as public-safety and fisheries measures, not as pollution control. The corporation should fund remediation from its own budget, because this is a consent violation, not a new project.