Maharashtra HSC Sociology study materials
Maharashtra HSC Sociology study resources

Maharashtra HSC Sociology: Social Research and Applied Sociology: Methods, Sampling and Ethics

Maharashtra HSC Sociology ยท Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Social Research and Applied Sociology: Methods, Sampling and Ethics

What this domain tests

This domain covers how sociological knowledge is produced and used: the steps of research, quantitative versus qualitative designs, methods and tools, sampling, ethics, and the applied uses of sociology in policy, industry and social work.

Core rules and concepts

  • Steps: choosing the problem, reviewing literature, framing the hypothesis, designing the study, sampling, collecting data, analysing, and reporting.
  • Types: pure versus applied; descriptive, exploratory and explanatory; quantitative versus qualitative.
  • Methods: survey, observation (participant and non-participant), interview (structured and unstructured), questionnaire, case study, experiment, content analysis, ethnography, focus group.
  • Tools: a schedule is filled in by the enumerator, a questionnaire by the respondent; the Likert scale measures attitudes; sociometry (Moreno) maps group relations.
  • Sampling: probability designs - simple random, systematic, stratified, cluster - permit generalisation; non-probability designs - purposive, quota, convenience, snowball - do not.
  • Ethics: informed consent, confidentiality, anonymity, no harm to respondents, voluntary withdrawal.
  • Applied sociology: policy evaluation, social work, market research, and industry - the Hawthorne studies (1924โ€“32, Elton Mayo) showed that being observed changes behaviour.

Worked example

Question: 'Do mid-day meals improve school attendance?' Reasoning: hypothesis - attendance is higher where meals are served; independent variable - provision of the meal; dependent variable - attendance rate; sample - stratified random selection of schools by district; data - attendance registers (secondary) plus interviews with teachers and parents (primary); comparison with schools lacking the scheme guards against spurious conclusions; parental consent satisfies ethics. Correlation alone would not prove causation.

Traps that cost marks

  • Reversing schedule and questionnaire.
  • Claiming non-probability samples support statistical generalisation.
  • Confusing a sample with the population, or a hypothesis with a conclusion.
  • Treating correlation as causation.
  • Omitting ethics when the question mentions fieldwork.