A Ratnagiri Alphonso FPO Weighs a Retail Chain Offer
A Ratnagiri FPO with 62 members and 90 ha of GI-tagged Alphonso expects 450 t this season. About 70% of the crop is sold at flowering to pre-harvest contractors at a lump Rs 45/kg on estimated weight; the rest goes loose to local markets. A Mumbai retail chain has offered to buy 20 t a week of uniformly 200-250 g, well-coloured fruit in 6 kg branded boxes at Rs 110/kg, but demands a packhouse with GI traceability, 48-hour delivery and 30-day credit. A packhouse costs Rs 35 lakh, with 50% subsidy available under MIDH. Packing and transport to Mumbai work out to about Rs 20/kg, and transit plus handling loss is around 10%; credit costs about 12% a year. The FPO has Rs 6 lakh in its revolving fund, one graduate secretary, and members who have never graded fruit. Carbide ripening is being checked by the FDA.
1. Compare net realisation per kg and per season between the contractor channel and the retail chain, then decide how much of the crop should go to the chain in year one.
Read the worked answer
Contractor channel
- Rs 45/kg for the whole crop, cash at flowering, no packing, no transport, no credit, no risk. On 450 t: 450,000 x 45 = about Rs 2.03 crore.
Retail chain, per kg
- Gross Rs 110; after 10% transit and handling loss the saleable value is Rs 99.
- Less packing and transport Rs 20 = Rs 79.
- Less 30-day credit cost, roughly Rs 1.1 (12% for a month on Rs 99) = about Rs 78 per kg.
But volume and grade limit the comparison
- Only a portion of the crop will meet 200-250 g and full colour - assume 55%, or about 250 t.
- 250 t at Rs 78 = Rs 1.95 crore; the remaining 200 t at a conservative Rs 40/kg = Rs 0.80 crore. Total about Rs 2.75 crore against Rs 2.03 crore.
- Against this, the FPO must fund Rs 17.5 lakh of its own packhouse cost, a packhouse manager and grading team (about Rs 5 lakh a year), and carry 30-day credit.
Decision: accept, but supply 10 t a week in year one, not 20 t. Half the offered volume protects the FPO from a rejection or default while the grading habit is being built, keeps the contractor channel as a price floor for ungraded fruit, and gives the chain a reliable partner. Scale to 20 t only after the first season's rejection data are known.
2. Design the aggregation, grading and traceability protocol the FPO needs before the first dispatch, and explain how a 62-member group with one graduate secretary can actually run it.
Read the worked answer
Protocol before the first box leaves
- Member agreement: a written supply contract stating expected quantity, grade standards, delivery days and penalties. No verbal commitments.
- Lot identity: every crate at the member's farm tagged with member code, plot number and harvest date; this is what makes GI traceability real rather than a logo.
- Grading line: size 200-250 g by ring or count per 6 kg box, colour assessed against a standard chart, firmness by hand, and rejection of damaged or latex-stained fruit at the farm gate, not at the packhouse.
- Quality check: 5% random sampling for TSS (target 14-15 degrees Brix and above) and a written rejection record with photographs.
- Post-harvest: hot water dip at 52 +/- 2 C for 5 minutes, or an approved fungicide dip, for anthracnose; ripening or degreening at 100 ppm ethylene, 20-22 C and 90-95% RH.
- Money flow: payment to members within 7 days of delivery, from a cash-credit limit against the chain's receivable, not from the Rs 6 lakh revolving fund.
Running it with scarce staff
- Hire one packhouse manager and four trained graders for the season - this is cheaper than a failed consignment.
- Create three-member grading sub-committees drawn from members on rotation, so grading is peer-owned and the manager is not accused of favouritism.
- Publish a member-wise acceptance and rejection sheet on the notice board and the WhatsApp group each week.
- Train the team through MIDH/NHB and the local KVK before the season starts, and run one dummy consignment with the municipality or a local retailer first.
3. The members have sold to contractors for twenty years and distrust grading. Outline the extension strategy you would use in one season to get at least 30% of volume into the graded channel, and how you would measure whether it worked.
Read the worked answer
Strategy for one season
- Start with a partial budget, in Marathi, per acre. Show the contractor rate in the same column as the graded-channel estimate and the packhouse cost share. Members act on numbers about their own plot, not on principles.
- Use five lead farmers with visible, well-managed orchards as demonstration plots. Each hosts one harvest-day grading demonstration where neighbours see their own fruit being sized and paid for.
- Pay a price differential in public. The first graded lot should be settled within the promised 7 days, and the per-kg realisation announced at the next general body meeting. Nothing persuades faster than an early, visible payout.
- Reduce the trust barrier: FPO pays a Rs 10/kg advance against delivered fruit so members are not financing the chain's 30-day credit.
- Use existing extension machinery: KVK and MIDH training on grading and ripening, one exposure visit to a functioning FPO or a grape exporter, and a daily price message on the group so members can see market movement.
- Phase the target: 30% of volume in year one, with the contractor channel retained for the rest, so no member loses money if the chain rejects a lot.
Measurement
- Track adoption by lot-wise data: number of members delivering graded fruit, volume accepted vs rejected by grade, average realisation per member against the contractor rate, and days to payment.
- Compare 30 members in the graded channel with 30 in the contractor channel on net realisation per acre. If the graded group does not show a clear gain by end of season, the strategy, not the members, needs revision.