The Fast and the Gherao: Judging a Liquor-Shop Satyagraha
The zilla parishad school in Karanja, Wardha district, has 62 students in Classes 5 to 8; 41 of them walk past the door of a country-liquor outlet that stands 80 metres from the school gate on the same lane. In June the outlet's licence was renewed for the third year although the parent-teacher association had filed 47 written objections and the mahila mandal had submitted a memorandum with 340 signatures. The excise sub-inspector says the premises comply with the distance rule as measured along the road and offers to consider relocation only in the next licence cycle in April.
The action committee, led by 25 young men, has announced a gherao of the excise office on 15 August and an indefinite hunger strike by three members. A second group wants to break the outlet's licence board and force it shut. A sarvodaya worker living in the town is asked to endorse the plan. Three of the young men have dependent families, and one is a government school teacher.
1. The committee asks you to endorse the 15 August gherao and the indefinite fast. Using Gandhian tests for satyagraha, set out what you would agree to, what you would refuse, and what must happen before any escalation.
Read the worked answer
Agree to: a verified demand, a deputation to the collector and excise superintendent within seven days, nonviolent picketing of the outlet by ten named volunteers, and a public reading of the 340 signatures. These are persuasive, open and sufferable by the protesters themselves.
Refuse: the gherao and the indefinite fast. A gherao physically prevents an official from working or leaving; that is coercion, not satyagraha. Gandhi permitted pickets that persuade and opposed pickets that block. Fasting is self-purification offered to those with whom one has a bond of trust; it cannot be used to force a rule-bound officer to break the law, and an indefinite fast by three members with dependants is a form of hostage-taking by the committee.
Preconditions before escalation: (i) facts verified - obtain the licence, site plan and measurement under the Right to Information Act, since the distance may genuinely be measured along the road; (ii) a written refusal received, so that the satyagrahi is responding and not anticipating; (iii) all signatories consenting to the plan and to being arrested; (iv) a constructive alternative ready, so the campaign is for something and not only against someone.
2. The second group proposes to break the outlet's licence board. Argue against this without simply calling it 'wrong'.
Read the worked answer
Argue from consequence and from method, not from moral superiority. Gandhi's claim was that means and ends are related as seed and tree: a violent method produces a violent settlement. Concretely - the board is replaced in a week; 25 men are named in an FIR; the school's teacher is transferred; the file goes to the collector with a law-and-order note instead of a sanitation note; the shopkeeper becomes the injured party and the 340 signatures lose their weight.
Name the cost to the group itself: the energy of 25 young men is the committee's chief asset, and it would be spent in a police station rather than on the campaign.
Then redirect it. Offer the group a verification squad - measure the distance, photograph the lane at 7 am and 4 pm, collect affidavits from parents, check whether minors are sold liquor. Keep the person and the act apart: the shopkeeper is a neighbour with a family, the wrong is the licence, and the excise officer is not an enemy but an official who can be given a reason to move. A refusal that leaves the group with a job is more likely to hold than a refusal that only forbids.
3. Draft the minimum programme you would place before the committee: the concrete demands, the constructive counterpart, and an exit route that lets the excise officer climb down without humiliation.
Read the worked answer
Demands (written, seven days): re-measurement of the distance in the presence of two parents; a copy of the licence and site plan; a decision on relocation to be recorded in the April cycle file now, not later; a signboard facing the lane barring sale to visibly under-18s and sale after 8 pm.
Constructive counterpart: twenty women run an evening study-and-games hour for the 62 children in the school veranda; the health centre holds a de-addiction camp; the five other shops on the lane sign a 'no sale to children' pledge. This is the part that makes the picket a programme rather than a protest.
Picketing: ten volunteers, two hours daily, standing off the premises, names published in advance, accepting arrest without resistance.
Exit route: do not demand an apology or a transfer. Let the sub-inspector issue the relocation as his own recommendation following a fresh measurement - he needs to be able to say he acted on evidence, not under pressure. Fix a review date after 30 days, and agree in advance that if the April relocation is recorded in writing, the agitation is suspended.