Age Dispute and Interim Custody of a Rescued Adolescent Domestic Worker
In Solapur district, the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) receives a 15-year-old girl rescued from a household where she worked 14 hours a day for Rs 1,500 a month. The employer produces a school leaving certificate showing she is 18; the girl says she is 14. There is no birth certificate. She belongs to a Scheduled Caste family from Beed, and her parents want her returned at once. A local NGO offers shelter 70 km away. The girl has a healing wrist fracture and has not been medically examined. The employer's brother-in-law is a municipal councillor who calls the district child protection officer (DCPO) asking that the case be 'settled'. The CWC must decide interim custody within 24 hours and the DCPO must document the case for the Juvenile Justice Board. The girl says she wants to study but is afraid of the employer.
1. What steps should the CWC and DCPO take to resolve the age dispute and decide interim custody? Explain the legal basis and the sequence of actions.
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: The age dispute cannot be resolved by the employer's certificate alone. Under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 framework, the CWC should first obtain the school admission register, Anganwadi record, panchayat birth record and any other reliable document. If these are inconclusive, a medical opinion should be sought; an ossification test is not mandatory and should not be used to defeat the child's stated age without corroboration. The girl's statement should be recorded separately, in a child-friendly manner, and her wrist injury must be medically examined and documented.
For interim custody, the CWC should consider the child's best interests, safety and consent. The family's request is relevant but not decisive; a home study and safety assessment are needed before reunification. The NGO shelter 70 km away may be a temporary option only if it is a registered fit facility and maintains contact with the family. The DCPO should record every step in the case file and place the child before the JJB within the statutory timeline. Age and custody are separate questions: age affects child status, while custody depends on safety and best interests.
2. How should the DCPO respond to the councillor's call and the parents' demand, while applying the best interests of the child and caste safeguards?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: The councillor's call should not be treated as a request to 'settle' the case. The DCPO should politely end the call, record the date, time and content, and inform the CWC and district collector in writing. This is a conflict-of-interest situation because the employer's relative holds public office. The parents' demand must be heard, but the child's best interests are paramount. The officer should ask why the girl fears the employer and whether the family can protect her; if the family is safe, supervised reunification with conditions may be appropriate.
If there is evidence of caste-based abuse or exploitation, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and child labour laws must be considered. The officer should not promise the councillor any outcome. Political pressure is not evidence, and a rights-based response protects both the child and the officer's impartiality. The family's caste status also means the girl may be entitled to safeguards and benefits, but those should not be used as a reason to delay protection.
3. What documentation and follow-up would you ensure for the girl's caste certificate and access to education and compensation?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: Documentation should begin with a case file containing the rescue report, medical report, age documents, statements and the CWC order. For the caste certificate, the DCPO should help the girl or her guardian apply through the school or tehsil office, using the family's caste record, school records and an affidavit if required. The child care institution can support the application as guardian.
The certificate should be linked to scholarships, hostels and post-rescue benefits, but the girl's immediate education should not wait for it. The officer should also document eligibility for victim compensation and aftercare under the child protection framework. Caste safeguards are not a favour; they are entitlements, and poor documentation should not become a barrier. All records must remain confidential to protect the child's identity, and follow-up should include school enrolment, counselling and a review of her safety at home.