MET study materials
MET study resources

MET (India State Engineering Entrance Exams): The Moving Workshop

MET · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Moving Workshop

A candidate listens once to a 90-second announcement about a study-day schedule. The first speaker says, 'The academic writing workshop will begin at 1:45 in Room 204.' Later the same speaker says, 'Sorry - correction: the workshop is at 2:15, not 1:45. Room 204 is right. And the networking session follows at 3:00.' A second speaker then says, 'Just to clarify, we've had to keep the workshop at 1:45 after all; 2:15 is now the networking session. The keynote remains at 4:30.' The candidate's notes read: 'Workshop 1:45? 2:15? Room 204. Networking 3:00/2:15. Keynote 4:30.' The question asks when the academic writing workshop begins. Options are 1:45, 2:15, 3:00, and 4:30. The candidate remembers the first correction and leans toward 2:15. No transcript is available, and 20 seconds remain.

1. Which time should the candidate choose, and which discourse cues settle the answer? Explain why the earlier correction should not win.

Read the worked answer

Choose 1:45. The decisive cues are in the second speaker's turn: 'Just to clarify' marks a final clarification, and 'after all' explicitly reverses the earlier change. The same turn reassigns 2:15: '2:15 is now the networking session.' That removes 2:15 as a workshop time.

The first speaker's 'Sorry - correction' was a mid-announcement repair, but it was later overridden. In listening tasks, a later explicit clarification usually supersedes an earlier one, especially when it uses 'after all' and names what the other time now belongs to. The candidate's memory is anchored to the first correction because it was surprising, not because it was final.

Check the other options: 3:00 was replaced by 2:15 for networking, and 4:30 is the keynote. Room 204 is unchanged, so it does not discriminate. Answer 1:45.

2. What note-taking format would reduce this confusion, and how should the candidate answer if they are still unsure between two times?

Read the worked answer

Use a three-column table or timeline: Event | Time | Status. Add a status marker whenever a speaker repairs or clarifies: 'Workshop 1:45 ← final (clarified)' rather than 'Workshop 1:45? 2:15?'. Arrows and initials are faster than question marks because they record the direction of the correction.

If still unsure, do not choose by familiarity or by which time was repeated most. Apply two checks: (1) use the last explicit clarification that assigns a time to the event in the question; (2) eliminate times that the announcement assigns to a different event. Here 2:15 belongs to networking, 3:00 was superseded, and 4:30 belongs to the keynote. That leaves 1:45.

This is also a general listening strategy: track event-time pairs, not isolated numbers, and treat clarification language as higher-priority evidence than an earlier announcement.