Ascending Triangle With a Failed Breakout
XYZ Bank has traded between ₹520 and ₹545 for seven weeks. Resistance at ₹545 has been tested five times; lows have risen from ₹520 to ₹526, ₹531, and ₹535, forming an ascending triangle. On Monday price breaks above ₹545 on volume 2.1 times the 20-day average and closes at ₹552. Tuesday it opens at ₹553 but reverses to close at ₹538 on volume 1.3 times average. Wednesday closes at ₹536. The pattern height is ₹25, implying a measured target near ₹570. The 50-day SMA is ₹532 and rising; RSI(14) peaked at 68 on the breakout and is now 54. A trader bought the breakout at ₹546 with a stop at ₹534 and a target of ₹570. The stock's average daily range is ₹9.
1. Was the breakout valid at the time, and what does Tuesday's reversal imply for the pattern?
Read the worked answer
At Monday's close the breakout had some validity: price closed above ₹545 and volume was 2.1 times average. But one close is not confirmation. Tuesday's reversal to ₹538 put price back inside the triangle and below ₹545, so the breakout failed to hold. A failed breakout is not automatically a bearish reversal; it shows buyers could not defend the breakout level. The pattern is now suspect. The key level is ₹535, the last higher low. A close below ₹535 would break the ascending triangle's support line and raise the odds of a failed pattern; holding above it keeps the consolidation alive.
2. Recalculate the measured move and evaluate whether the entry, stop, and target are logically placed.
Read the worked answer
Measured move: height = ₹545 - ₹520 = ₹25; target = ₹545 + ₹25 = ₹570. That target is a guideline, not a guarantee. The stop at ₹534 is just below the ₹535 higher low, which is logical. It is about 2.2% below the ₹546 entry, while the target is about 4.4% above, giving roughly 2:1 reward-to-risk. But after Tuesday's reversal the breakout entry is no longer valid because price closed back inside the pattern. If the trader still holds, the stop at ₹534 is reasonable, but the target should not be assumed. The pattern must re-confirm with a close above ₹545. A stop at ₹534 also risks being triggered by normal volatility because the average daily range is ₹9.
3. What evidence would distinguish a shakeout from a failed pattern, and how should the trader respond?
Read the worked answer
A shakeout would show price dipping below ₹545, then reclaiming it quickly on strong volume while ₹535 holds. A failed pattern would show a close below ₹535 and then a lower high. Volume matters: a low-volume retest of ₹545 that fails is less convincing than a high-volume recovery. The 50-day SMA at ₹532 is also relevant; a close below it would weaken the bullish structure. The practical response is to cancel the breakout entry, mark ₹535 and ₹545 as decision levels, and wait for either a fresh close above ₹545 or a breakdown below ₹535 before committing risk.