Running Account Left Unsettled: Client Funds and Securities at a Stock Broker
Sundaram Securities is a SEBI-registered stock broker with 1,850 active clients. On 30 June the compliance officer reviews the client funding position and finds ₹6.4 crore of client funds parked in the firm's designated client bank account and ₹3.1 crore of client securities held as collateral. The last comprehensive settlement of client funds and securities was 72 days earlier. Of the client base, 410 clients have signed a running-account authorisation, but every authorisation was signed more than 18 months ago and none has been refreshed. The back office nets each client's ledger monthly and treats the authorisation as permanent, so no client has been asked to confirm the balance in the last quarter. Separately, 26 clients carry debit balances of ₹1.1 crore, and securities of 9 clients are pledged with a bank for the firm's own borrowing. Two clients have complained that their shares were used to meet another client's delivery obligation.
1. Identify the compliance failures in the firm's client funds and securities handling, and state the settlement discipline it should have followed.
Read the worked answer
Issue. The firm has converted a limited-purpose running account into permanent custody of client assets and has crossed the segregation line.
Rule. A running-account authorisation permits retention of funds and securities only to meet the client's own obligations. It must be refreshed, and settlement must occur at least once every 30 days where nothing is outstanding, or within 90 days where a balance is outstanding; where there is no transaction, the balance must be returned. Client funds must sit in the designated client account, client securities cannot be pledged for the firm's own borrowing, and one client's assets cannot be used for another client's obligation.
Application. The 72-day gap, the 18-month-old authorisations and the absence of any quarterly balance confirmation are breaches. The ₹1.1 crore debit balances of 26 clients cannot be funded out of other clients' ₹6.4 crore. The pledge of 9 clients' securities for the firm's bank borrowing is a serious misapplication of client assets, and the two complaints suggest actual inter-client transfers.
Conclusion. The compliance officer should treat this as a breach of the client-asset segregation and running-account framework, not a back-office lapse.
2. Set out the immediate remediation plan and the reporting and governance steps you would take as compliance officer.
Read the worked answer
Immediate remediation. Stop netting ledgers monthly. Recompute each client's funds and securities position client-wise, identify every instance where one client's assets were used for another, and restore the affected clients in full. Return all unencumbered client funds and securities, with a written statement of account, to clients who have not transacted or whose authorisation is stale. Obtain fresh running-account authorisations on the prescribed format, with a clear option for clients to refuse.
Pledge issue. Procure release of the 9 clients' pledged securities from the bank, replace the collateral with the firm's own assets, and take legal advice on whether client consent and a proper pledge for that client's own obligation can cure each case.
Reporting and governance. Place the findings before the board or the designated director, record the timeline of discovery, and report to the stock exchange and SEBI as required under the broker regulations and the applicable circulars. Preserve all ledgers, bank statements, pledge records and complaint files. Order a special internal audit covering the same period, fix accountability of the back-office and compliance staff, and send a client communication with a grievance-redressal route. Do not wait for the next inspection.
3. How should the firm deal with the 26 debit-balance clients and the 9 clients whose securities are pledged?
Read the worked answer
Debit-balance clients. Each of the 26 accounts must be treated individually. The firm should issue a clear notice of the debit, the exact amount, the transactions that created it, and a fixed cure period, and should not set off one client's debit against another client's credit. If the client fails to pay, the firm may close out the client's positions or sell that client's securities only after the notice and in accordance with the agreed broker-client terms, the exchange bye-laws and the regulations. Any shortfall remains a recoverable claim; any surplus must go back to that client.
Pledged securities. The pledge is valid only for that client's own obligation, not for the firm's borrowing. The firm should identify the lender, the pledge instruction and the client consent, and unwind the arrangement. If the bank will not release the securities, the firm must substitute its own collateral, disclose the position to the client, and make good any loss. Where a client did not authorise the pledge, the matter becomes a client-asset misappropriation requiring reporting and possibly disciplinary action against responsible employees.
Common thread. Both issues show the danger of treating the client ledger as a single pool. The fix is client-wise reconciliation, documented notice, and independent oversight by compliance.