Revocation of an Off-Market DIS After Cut-Off but Before Execution
Meera submits a delivery instruction slip to her DP at 3:40 pm on 12 August to transfer 5,000 shares of XYZ Ltd to her father's account with another DP. The DIS quotes the father's DP ID and client ID, but one digit in the client ID is wrong; the name 'Ramesh' matches. The DP's cut-off for same-day processing is 4:00 pm. At 4:10 pm Meera emails: 'Please cancel the transfer; my father's account is closed and I will transfer to my own account with another DP.' The DP's maker had uploaded the instruction at 4:05 pm; the checker executes it at 4:25 pm. The father's DP rejects the credit because the client ID is invalid. The shares are returned to Meera after three days. The transfer was a gift, and no consideration was paid. Meera complains that the DP ignored her cancellation and executed a defective instruction.
1. Should the DP have executed the instruction after receiving Meera's email? How should it handle a revocation that arrives after the cut-off but before execution?
Read the worked answer
No. The 4:00 pm cut-off is an internal processing deadline; it is not a right to ignore a revocation received before actual execution. The DP received a written cancellation at 4:10 pm and executed at 4:25 pm. Before execution, the operations team should have checked for client communications, placed the instruction on hold and sought confirmation.
There is a second problem: the beneficiary client ID was invalid. A matching name does not cure an invalid account number. The DP should have verified the DP ID and client ID against the depository system and rejected the instruction before execution. The maker-checker process should include a check for pending revocations, and the email should be preserved in the audit trail. Once an instruction has actually been executed at the depository, the DP cannot reverse it unilaterally; it would need the beneficiary's consent and a fresh transfer. Here, execution came after the revocation, so the DP's handling was defective.
2. What is the correct treatment of an off-market gift transfer in demat form, and what should the DP verify before acting on the DIS?
Read the worked answer
An off-market gift transfer still requires a valid DIS and must be processed as an off-market transfer, not as a market trade. The DP should verify:
- the transferor's signature and available free balance;
- the transferee DP ID and client ID, with the name matching the depository record;
- that the shares are not pledged, frozen or locked in;
- that both accounts are KYC-compliant;
- a gift declaration and supporting proof from the transferor.
Consideration is nil, so the DP should record the gift character correctly. Stamp duty treatment depends on the consideration and applicable stamp law; the DP should not invent a consideration or process the gift as a sale. If the beneficiary account is invalid or closed, the DIS must be rejected before execution.