Mixed Demat Request with Name Change, Lock-In and Mutilated Certificates
Arjun submits a demat request form to his DP for 300 shares of a listed company. The lot contains three certificates of 100 shares each. The first 100 are in his old name, 'Arjun Rao'; his account and PAN now show 'Arjun Rao Mehta' after a surname change. The second 100 are marked lock-in until 30 September. The third 100 are mutilated: the distinctive numbers are illegible and the folio number is smudged. The DP rejects the entire request with a memo citing name mismatch and a mutilated certificate. Arjun says the lock-in shares can still be dematerialised and at least those should be processed. The DP says partial processing of a single DRF is not possible. Arjun has a name-change affidavit and a gazette notification. The DRF is dated 10 August.
1. Was the DP correct to reject the entire DRF? How should a DP handle a mixed lot with some defective certificates?
Read the worked answer
No. The DP should scrutinise the certificates in the lot and reject only those that are defective. A single DRF can cover several certificates, and a DP can issue a rejection memo for specific certificates while processing the eligible ones. Rejecting all 300 shares because one certificate is mutilated is not correct if the other certificates are otherwise in order.
The DP should record the rejection reasons certificate-wise, return the rejected certificates or advise the rectification route, and process the balance. If the DRF itself needs correction, the DP should ask for a fresh or amended form rather than treating the whole lot as invalid. The key is that partial rejection is an operational possibility; the DP's blanket statement that partial processing is impossible is wrong.
2. How should each of the three certificates be treated, including the lock-in shares and the mutilated certificate?
Read the worked answer
- Old-name 100 shares: A name mismatch must be explained. With the affidavit and gazette notification, the DP can verify the chain from 'Arjun Rao' to 'Arjun Rao Mehta'. If satisfied, it can process the demat request; if not, it should reject with a clear reason and ask for further proof.
- Lock-in 100 shares: Lock-in does not bar dematerialisation. The shares can be dematerialised, but the lock-in will be recorded in the demat account and the shares remain locked until 30 September. They cannot be sold during the lock-in.
- Mutilated 100 shares: A certificate with illegible distinctive numbers and a smudged folio number cannot be safely verified. The DP should reject that certificate and advise Arjun to obtain a duplicate or replacement certificate from the company or registrar before resubmitting.
The DP should process the eligible certificates and issue a rejection memo for the defective one.