NISM Series XIX-A study materials
NISM Series XIX-A study resources

Public Advertisement, Assured Returns and Unregistered Sub-Agents

NISM Series XIX-A · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Public Advertisement, Assured Returns and Unregistered Sub-Agents

A wealth firm wants to launch a marketing campaign for a Category II debt fund. The draft newspaper advertisement says: AIF for everyone, 8% assured returns, minimum investment Rs 25 lakh, cash and cheque accepted, 3% commission to sub-distributors. The firm plans to run the ad in a regional newspaper and on social media, collect commitments from walk-in investors at a hotel seminar, and pay 3% to 40 unregistered sub-agents who bring clients. The fund’s PPM states a minimum commitment of Rs 1 crore, a maximum of 1,000 investors, a tenure of five years, and that returns are not guaranteed. The firm’s compliance officer has not reviewed the draft. The first seminar is in ten days and the firm has already printed 5,000 brochures.

1. Identify the regulatory and distribution failures in the proposed campaign.

Read the worked answer

The campaign treats a private placement as a public retail offer. AIF units cannot be advertised to the general public or solicited through newspaper, social media or open hotel seminars. The claim of 8% assured returns is misleading because the PPM says returns are not guaranteed; a target or expected return must not be presented as assured. The stated minimum of Rs 25 lakh conflicts with the PPM’s Rs 1 crore minimum, and any carve-out would require specific eligibility and documentation, not a blanket advertisement. Cash should not be accepted; subscriptions must follow the prescribed banking and KYC route. The 3% commission to 40 unregistered sub-agents creates serious AML, KYC and conduct risks, and the firm remains responsible for how its products are sold. The compliance officer’s absence from the review is itself a control failure. The printed brochures should not be used until corrected and approved.

2. What should the firm do before any investor is onboarded?

Read the worked answer

The firm should stop the campaign, withdraw the newspaper and social media drafts, and destroy or correct the printed brochures. It should rewrite the materials to describe the fund accurately, with the PPM minimum, risk factors, illiquidity, tenure, fees and the absence of assured returns. Marketing should be limited to private placement with identified prospective investors, not open solicitation. The firm should require compliance approval of every material before release. It should conduct due diligence on any intermediary or sub-agent, verify identity and AML status, and ensure that commission arrangements are disclosed and documented. It should not accept cash and should follow the prescribed subscription, bank verification and KYC process for each investor. The seminar should not be used to collect commitments from walk-ins; any event should be restricted to pre-identified investors and should include balanced risk disclosure. The firm should retain records of approvals, corrections and investor onboarding.

3. How should commission and sub-agent arrangements be handled?

Read the worked answer

Commission should be disclosed in writing to the investor before subscription, including the rate, the payer and any additional incentive. The investor should be told that the commission may create a conflict of interest. The firm should not use commission as the main reason for a recommendation and should keep a suitability rationale. Sub-agents should be selected under a documented due-diligence process, with identity verification, AML checks and clear contractual obligations on private-placement conduct, data protection and mis-selling. The firm should monitor their activities and be able to show that it controls what is said to investors. Payments should be traceable and should not be made in cash. If a sub-agent is unregistered or cannot meet the firm’s standards, the firm should not use that person. The firm should also check whether the fund documents or distribution agreements permit the proposed commission and whether any cap or disclosure requirement applies.