Starting Fieldwork Before Registration and Subcontracting an Out-of-State Investigator
Ridgeline Investigations holds an active Indiana private investigator firm license and has six registered investigators on staff. On March 3, the owner hires Jordan, who has 11 years of military police experience but no Indiana investigator registration, and assigns Jordan to a six-day surveillance of a workers compensation claimant beginning March 6. The office manager says, 'Start now; the paperwork can catch up.' The firm also subcontracts a three-day asset search to Reyes, a Texas-licensed investigator with no Indiana license. Reyes never travels to Indiana; she uses online databases and calls an Indiana bank pretending to be the account holder's accountant. A separate client asks for two armed executive-protection agents for a four-day trade show. The firm's license is for private investigation only and does not list security guard or executive protection services. The owner wants to know whether the March 6 assignment, the Reyes subcontract, and the trade-show request can proceed under the existing firm license.
1. Can Jordan lawfully begin the six-day surveillance on March 6 under Ridgeline's firm license? Explain the licensing principle and the immediate steps the owner should take.
Read the worked answer
No. A firm license authorizes the firm to conduct investigations through personnel who satisfy Indiana's individual registration or licensing requirements; the firm cannot lend its license to an unregistered person and cure the defect afterward. Jordan's military police experience may help with training, but experience does not substitute for the required Indiana credential. Allowing Jordan to conduct field surveillance on March 6 would create a licensing violation, expose the firm to discipline, and give the client a basis to challenge the investigation and any evidence obtained.
The owner should immediately remove Jordan from the surveillance assignment, staff the job with a currently registered investigator, and verify Jordan's application status before any field work. Jordan may perform only non-investigative clerical tasks until registration is effective. The owner should also document the correction in the file, notify the client if staffing changes affect the deadline, and review onboarding procedures so no new hire is placed in the field based on a verbal 'paperwork can catch up' instruction.
2. May Ridgeline use Reyes for the three-day asset search? Analyze the fact that Reyes never enters Indiana and the method she proposes for the bank inquiry.
Read the worked answer
No, not as proposed. An out-of-state license does not automatically authorize investigative work governed by Indiana law, and the firm remains responsible for work it subcontracts to its clients. Reyes's physical location in Texas does not make the conduct beyond Indiana's reach: she is targeting an Indiana bank and an Indiana account holder, and the firm is selling the result to an Indiana client. The firm should either use a properly credentialed Indiana investigator or confirm in writing that a recognized exemption or reciprocity provision applies; a Texas license alone is not that confirmation.
Separately, calling an Indiana bank while pretending to be the account holder's accountant is pretexting to obtain financial information. That method can violate state deception and identity statutes as well as federal financial-privacy restrictions, regardless of whether Reyes enters Indiana. The firm should stop the subcontract, decline to use the bank records already sought, and substitute lawful sources such as public records, court-authorized discovery, or consensual records from the account holder. The owner should document why the method was rejected.
3. What should the firm do about the request for two armed executive-protection agents at the trade show?
Read the worked answer
The firm should not accept the trade-show request under its current private investigation license without confirming separate authorization. Executive protection, especially armed protection, is not automatically within a private investigation firm license. It may require a security guard or protective-services license, individual registration for armed personnel, firearms qualifications, insurance, and client contract terms that the firm does not currently have. Advertising or providing armed agents without the required authority would be an unlicensed practice and a serious liability exposure.
The owner should tell the client in writing that the firm cannot provide armed agents at this time and should not simply relabel the work as 'investigative presence.' The firm may offer a lawful alternative, such as unarmed observational support or referral to a properly licensed security provider, after confirming the other provider's credentials. If the firm wants to expand into protection work, it should obtain the correct license and insurance before accepting any engagement, not after the trade show begins.