Flat-Fee Retainer, Refusal to Account, and Misleading 'FBI-Trained' Advertising
Northstar PI LLC has a $4,000 flat-fee agreement for a 30-day infidelity investigation. The agreement says the retainer is 'nonrefundable under all circumstances' and the firm 'may terminate at any time.' The client pays $4,000 by credit card. The firm deposits the money into its general operating account and uses $1,200 to pay rent. After nine days, the client fires the firm and asks for an accounting and a copy of the file, including surveillance logs and the investigator's notes. The owner refuses, saying the work product belongs to the firm and the retainer is earned. The firm's website says 'Licensed in Indiana and FBI-trained' although the owner completed only a two-day FBI Citizen's Academy. The owner also asks whether to keep the file for 90 days and then shred it.
1. Analyze the retainer, the deposit into the operating account, and the client's request for an accounting after nine days.
Read the worked answer
The label 'nonrefundable under all circumstances' does not by itself make the entire $4,000 earned on Day 1. A flat fee can be structured as earned on receipt if the agreement and disclosures are proper, but a blanket nonrefundable clause combined with a nine-day termination and no accounting is vulnerable to challenge. The firm must be able to show what work was performed, what expenses were incurred, and what portion of the fee was actually earned. If any portion is unearned, the client is entitled to a refund or credit.
Depositing the entire $4,000 into the general operating account and spending $1,200 on rent is a serious fiduciary problem. Client funds held before they are earned are client property; commingling them with operating money and using them for firm overhead can violate Indiana licensing rules, trust-accounting principles, and the implied duty of good faith. The firm should have segregated unearned funds and transferred them to operating only as fees were earned. The owner should immediately reconstruct the accounting, place any unearned balance in a proper trust or client-funds account, and provide the client with an itemized statement showing time, expenses, and the refund calculation.
2. Must the firm give the client the surveillance logs and investigator notes? What should the firm produce, and what may it withhold?
Read the worked answer
The firm should not take the blanket position that all work product belongs to the firm and nothing will be produced. The client paid for an investigation of the client's own matter and is entitled to an accounting and to the factual results of the work. Surveillance logs, dates and times of observation, photographs and video of the client's spouse in public, and the investigator's factual notes about what was observed are generally part of the client's file. Refusing to produce them invites a licensing complaint, a civil claim, and damage to the firm's reputation.
The firm may withhold or redact limited material if it has a legitimate basis: internal firm financial records, unrelated client information, privileged communications with its attorney, or third-party confidential information not relevant to the client's matter. If it withholds anything, it should identify the category and explain why rather than refuse wholesale. The firm should provide copies in a usable format, keep originals secure, and document what was produced. Because litigation may be reasonably anticipated after the termination, the firm should place a legal hold on the file and not destroy anything.
3. Evaluate the website claim 'FBI-trained.' What should the owner do about it, and what is a reasonable records-retention approach instead of shredding after 90 days?
Read the worked answer
The claim 'FBI-trained' is misleading. Completing a two-day FBI Citizen's Academy is civic education, not FBI training or FBI credentials. Advertising that implies law-enforcement training, affiliation, or endorsement can violate Indiana advertising and professional-conduct rules and can mislead consumers. The owner should remove the phrase immediately, replace it with an accurate description such as 'completed FBI Citizen's Academy' only if the firm can substantiate it, and review all other website and social-media claims for similar exaggeration. The firm should keep a copy of the corrected page and the date of the change.
Shredding the file after 90 days is too aggressive, especially after a client termination and a fee dispute. The firm should retain the engagement agreement, accounting, correspondence, surveillance logs, evidence, and production records for a period consistent with Indiana licensing requirements, contract terms, tax and insurance needs, and any applicable statute of limitations. Because a dispute is reasonably anticipated, the firm should impose a litigation hold and preserve the entire file, including electronic evidence and metadata, until counsel confirms release. A retention schedule with defined categories, secure storage, and a documented destruction process is appropriate; ad hoc shredding after 90 days is not.