A Plaque for a Village Well
A village gurdwara committee near Sultanpur Lodhi wants to install a plaque. The proposed text reads: 'Guru Nanak rested here and drank from this well in 1500 CE.' The committee's evidence is a 1970s oral-history booklet, a well marked on a 1901 revenue map, and the present gurdwara building, which dates from 1925. No contemporary text names the village. A retired teacher says the exact year cannot be proved. A local shopkeeper offers to pay for a marble plaque if it keeps the date 1500. The committee has ₹8,000 and wants to avoid both disbelief and overclaiming. It must agree on wording before the foundation-laying ceremony next month. The gurdwara is visited by school groups, and the committee fears that a wrong date will be copied into local textbooks.
1. Draft plaque wording of no more than 35 words that is defensible, and explain each choice.
Read the worked answer
Plaque: 'Local tradition holds that Guru Nanak visited this place. The well is shown on a 1901 revenue map; the present gurdwara was built in 1925.' This is defensible because it separates three claims: tradition (belief), the well's documentary record (1901), and the building's date (1925). It does not assert an exact year or a specific act such as drinking. 'Local tradition holds' is honest and respectful; it does not say the tradition is false. The plaque should avoid 'in 1500 CE' unless a source supports it.
2. How should the committee handle the date 1500 CE? What would make a date claim stronger?
Read the worked answer
The date 1500 CE should be dropped from the plaque or put in a booklet as 'traditional date, not documented'. A date claim becomes stronger with an older manuscript, an inscription, a contemporary travel account, or archaeological dating of the well and associated deposits. Even then, the association with the Guru needs independent evidence. The committee can say 'date not known' and still honour the memory. The shopkeeper's offer should not decide the wording; funding cannot create evidence.
3. A visitor says oral tradition is worthless. Give a reasoned response with one strength and one weakness of oral history.
Read the worked answer
Oral tradition is not worthless: it can preserve place-memory, ritual practice, and names that documents omit, and it can point archaeologists to a site. Its weakness is that exact dates and details change as stories are retold, and a community may simplify or idealise. The visitor should be told that historians use oral tradition as a lead, then test it against documents, inscriptions and archaeology. It is evidence, but not the same kind as a contemporary inscription.