Nomination for District Heritage Funding
A district committee in Rupnagar has ₹20 lakh and can nominate one site for state heritage funding. Site A is a mound with Painted Grey Ware, Northern Black Polished Ware, and Gupta-period coins; at its foot is a 16th-century baoli used by farmers. It is endangered by encroachment and a new road. Site B is an 1860s canal rest house, largely intact, linked to the irrigation colony; it is privately owned, empty, and the owner wants to demolish it. The committee's criteria are historical significance, rarity, community use, and urgency. A member argues for B because the building is complete; another argues for A because it is older. The committee has one week and a single nomination form. It must recommend one site and state conditions.
1. Which site should the committee nominate, and how does each criterion apply? Recommend one and justify the trade-off.
Read the worked answer
Recommend Site A. On historical significance, A is multi-period-PGW, NBPW and Gupta coins-while B is a single 1860s building. On rarity, A's combination of a mound and a living baoli is less common than a canal rest house. On community use, the baoli is used by farmers; B is empty. On urgency, A faces encroachment and a road, while B faces demolition if the owner acts. The trade-off is that B is more complete and its loss would be irreversible; the committee can put B on a local heritage list and ask the owner for a stay, but the single nomination should go to A. The reason is that A combines archaeological depth, living use and immediate threat; B's main strength is architectural completeness, not rarity or community value.
2. What survey or documentation should be done before the final decision, and why?
Read the worked answer
Before finalising, the committee needs a surface survey and mapping of the mound, a condition report on the baoli, an ownership and land-use check, and a photographic record of B. It should also record oral histories of the baoli's use. This matters because funding conditions may require a boundary, a conservation plan, and proof that the site is not already protected. The survey can also show whether the road will cut the mound or only pass nearby, which changes the urgency.
3. How can the committee protect the baoli's community use if Site A is chosen?
Read the worked answer
If A is chosen, protect community use by keeping the baoli open, involving farmers in the plan, and avoiding fencing that blocks access. The conservation plan should include drainage and steps, not a fence alone. Interpretation should explain the baoli as a living water structure, not only as an archaeological object. A small committee with village representatives can monitor encroachment. Funding should cover a caretaker and signage. This balances preservation with the use that gives the site its value.