Defending a Gharana Label in a Viva
A candidate trained in the Banaras baaj reaches the viva of a conservatoire competition. The panel says: 'Name the gharana of each item you played and justify it.' The programme was a Teental Peshkar, a Kayda with four Paltas, a Teental Rela and a Chautal Paran. The candidate's teacher has advised labelling the Kayda 'Delhi' because it opens with 'dha dha te te', and the Paran 'Banaras' because it contains pakhawaj bols such as 'dha te te'. Pressed for reasons, the candidate says: 'the gharana is in the bols.' The panel then plays three fragments: (i) a Kayda built on long 'tirakita' phrases over a heavy, sustained 'dha'; (ii) a composition using 'dhet' and 'ta' with a light, springing gait; (iii) a Paran closing on a wide, open bayan 'ghe'. The candidate must comment on each and state how far bols alone can justify a gharana label.
1. Is 'the gharana is in the bols' a defensible answer? Explain what actually constitutes gharana identity, with examples.
Read the worked answer
It is not defensible as stated, and a panel will press exactly there. A gharana is a transmitted style lineage, identified by a bundle of features, of which the bol text is only the most portable element.
What carries the identity:
- Repertoire: which forms a lineage prizes - Delhi's peshkar-and-kayda exposition with elaborate paltas; Banaras's parans, chakradar parans and gats in the pakhawaj-derived idiom; Lucknow's gat-paran and lighter pakhawaj-influenced material; Farrukhabad's gats and 'dhet'-heavy kaydas; Ajrada's dense paltas on 'dha te te'.
- Stroke production: whether 'dha' is open and resonant (Banaras) or compact and bright (Delhi); how the ring finger is used for 'na'; how much bayan is used.
- Bayan treatment: a wide, booming 'ghe' points to pakhawaj-derived lineages; close, clipped bayan work to others.
- Structural habits: preference for peshkar before kayda, use of chakradar, length of paltas, and the laya at which a lineage's material 'sits'.
- Lineage: Siddhar Khan Dhadi for Delhi, Modu–Bakshu for Lucknow, Haji Vilayat Ali for Farrukhabad, Miru–Kallu for Ajrada, Ram Sahai for Banaras.
Bols migrate between gharanas; the same 'dha dha te te' can be played in several. The answer should be: bols suggest, treatment decides.
2. How should the candidate justify the Kayda and the Paran in the viva, and what should be said about the Peshkar and Rela in the programme?
Read the worked answer
Justification must be honest and layered, not a label slapped on a form.
Kayda: 'dha dha te te' opening is common coinage; it is a pointer, not proof. The candidate should say: 'this theme uses a Delhi-type cell; I was taught it in the Banaras baaj and I play it with our stroke production - fuller 'dha', more bayan - so I would call it Delhi-derived material in Banaras treatment.' That distinction earns credit; claiming it flatly as Delhi invites one question about paltas and one about stroke and the claim collapses.
Chautal Paran: here the label is safer, because parans and pakhawaj bols are genuinely central to the Banaras repertoire, as are chakradar parans and the wide bayan. The candidate should name the markers explicitly: pakhawaj-derived bols, open 'dha', the closing 'ghe', and the form itself - a Paran in a dhrupad tala.
Peshkar and Rela: say which lineage's model they follow and note that the Banaras baaj has its own peshkar and rela practice rather than borrowing Delhi's. Owning the mixed training honestly - 'this item is idiomatic to X, and here is how my gharana shapes it' - is stronger than a clean-sounding claim the panel can dismantle.
3. For each of the panel's three fragments, say what you would listen for, what you might conclude, and how confident you could be.
Read the worked answer
Fragment (i): long 'tirakita' phrases over a heavy sustained 'dha'. Listen for whether the tirakita is played with even, articulated strokes or as a smear, and whether the 'dha' is open (Banaras-leaning) or compact and bright (Delhi-leaning). Long tirakita with weight is often associated with Farrukhabad and with Delhi-trained players; the answer should name two possibilities and the stroke feature that would separate them.
Fragment (ii): 'dhet' and 'ta' with a light, springing gait. 'Dhet' is a strong marker of Farrukhabad material, and a springing, gat-like gait supports that reading. Here the confidence can be moderately high, but say why - the bol, the gait, the brevity of phrases - rather than producing a name alone.
Fragment (iii): a Paran closing on a wide open 'ghe'. Paran form plus a booming bayan is a strong pointer to the pakhawaj-derived lineages - Banaras or Lucknow - and the closing bayan stroke is the discriminator; stroke weight and the shape of the final tihai would be needed to choose between them.
The examiner's real question is whether the candidate knows the limits: bols narrow the field, treatment decides, and some fragments are genuinely ambiguous. Saying 'I would need to hear the bayan and the paltas before naming it' is a correct answer, not an evasion.