The fifteen-year-old's disclosure, the mother's demand and the subpoena
Thandi D. is a counselling psychologist in private practice in Gqeberha. Lerato, 15 and in Grade 10, was referred by her school for low mood and cutting. In the fourth session Lerato discloses that her mother's boyfriend has had sexual intercourse with her since she was 13. She begs Thandi to tell no one and says she will kill herself if her mother finds out. Lerato also mentions, almost in passing, that her 8-year-old cousin sleeps over at the house on weekends. The mother telephones the next day demanding "the whole file - she is a minor and I am the one paying". A week later Thandi receives a subpoena from the boyfriend's attorney in the criminal trial, calling for "all notes, recordings and the complete psychological record" and requiring attendance in ten days. Thandi's file consists of three handwritten pages; there is no consent form, no record that the limits of confidentiality were explained, and no supervision notes.
1. What are Thandi's reporting obligations, in what order should she act, and does reporting breach confidentiality?
Read the worked answer
The reporting duty is statutory, not discretionary. Psychologists are expressly listed among the professionals who must report to a designated child protection organisation, the provincial Department of Social Development or a police official where there are reasonable grounds to conclude that a child has been sexually abused (Children's Act 38 of 2005, section 110). The threshold is reasonable grounds, not proof, and the child's request, the mother's wishes and the therapeutic relationship are all irrelevant to whether the report is made.
There is a parallel duty under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 to report knowledge of a sexual offence committed against a child. A 13-year-old cannot consent in law, so the "relationship" framing must be rejected outright.
Order of operations. (1) Do a suicide risk assessment now; Lerato's threat is a genuine clinical signal alongside a disclosure. (2) Report the abuse, promptly - same day or next working day - and flag the 8-year-old cousin explicitly, because a child in the same household is at risk and the report must name her. (3) Activate child protection and, if risk is imminent, emergency services. (4) Document the disclosure in Lerato's own words, the decision, the time, the recipient and the reference number.
Confidentiality. Good-faith statutory reporting is protected and is not a breach of confidentiality; the ethical duty is subject to the law. But Thandi should not simply disappear into procedure: tell Lerato beforehand, explain what she must do and why, offer to be with her when the news is conveyed, and keep her involved as far as is safe. What she must not do is promise secrecy she cannot keep - and she appears to have had no conversation about the limits of confidentiality at the outset, which is itself a record-keeping and consent failure.
2. How should Thandi respond to the mother's demand for "the whole file"?
Read the worked answer
Neither reflex applies. Handing over the file and refusing outright are both wrong answers.
The legal frame. A parent or guardian generally acts for a minor child in relation to health care, and the National Health Act 61 of 2003 gives a user access to health records. But the same Act and the Children's Act recognise that a child of 12 or older with sufficient maturity may consent to treatment and control information about it. Lerato is 15, articulate, and has been in therapy for four sessions. Her confidentiality interest does not evaporate because her mother pays.
What the mother is entitled to and what she is not. She is entitled to be told that her daughter is in care, that she is safe, what the treatment plan is, and anything she needs to know to meet Lerato's needs - and she needs to know that a child protection process has begun, because she will be contacted. She is not automatically entitled to verbatim disclosure of a sexual abuse allegation that is now the subject of a criminal investigation, where premature disclosure could expose Lerato to pressure, intimidation or retaliation in a household that contains the alleged perpetrator.
Practical sequence. Acknowledge the call promptly in writing. Invite the mother to a meeting. Explain, without disclosing detail, that there are limits on what can be shared and why. Get Lerato's view on what her mother may be told, and record it. Coordinate with the investigating social worker so the family is engaged through the child protection process rather than in an unmanaged confrontation at home.
If she insists. She may approach the court or the Information Regulator's processes for access. Thandi should take advice before responding further, document her reasoning at the time, and never alter the file. The missing consent form and missing limits-of-confidentiality note will count against her - record-keeping failures are judged on the record as it stands, not on what she remembers.
3. How should Thandi deal with the subpoena from the defence attorney?
Read the worked answer
Ignore nothing. A subpoena must be obeyed; disregarding it exposes her to contempt. Equally, a subpoena is not a warrant to hand the whole file to the attorney who issued it.
First steps. Check that the subpoena is validly issued, what precisely it calls for, and the return date. Ten days is enough time to act, but only if she starts immediately. Contact the issuing attorney to clarify scope and to propose that the record be produced to the court rather than released to a party.
The privilege question. South African law does not give psychologists an absolute therapist–patient privilege equivalent to legal professional privilege. Confidentiality is a strong statutory and ethical duty that yields to a lawful court order or statutory obligation - but it yields to the court, not to the convenience of an attorney. She should inform the court of Lerato's privacy interests, ask that access be limited or that the material be sealed, and raise objection through the proper channel rather than deciding the question herself.
Protect the patient. Explain to Lerato, in age-appropriate terms, what a subpoena is and what will happen. Consider whether she needs a separate representative or curator. If there is any risk of harm to Lerato or the cousin arising from the disclosure, say so to the court.
Produce narrowly. Supply only what is called for and relevant. Redact third-party information - other patients, other family members, the school. Keep a copy of exactly what was produced and to whom. Attend, and answer truthfully; compliance with a court order is not misconduct.
Separately. Notify her indemnity insurer now, not after the hearing, and take a legal opinion on the production question before the return date.