A Textile Mill Closure and a Water-Stressed District Economy
A district economy in Rajasthan is being reviewed after a textile mill announces closure. The workforce is 58% primary (mainly cotton, groundnut and livestock), 16% secondary (ginning, oil pressing, one textile mill) and 26% tertiary (tourism, trade, transport). The mill employs 1,150 workers, of whom 38% are women; it buys 22% of the district's cotton. Groundwater in two blocks has fallen by 1.3 m per year, and cotton acreage expanded by 18% in five years. The district has a fort visited by 70,000 tourists, mostly from November to February, but only 900 hotel and guide jobs. Officials propose either (a) a subsidy to reopen the mill, or (b) a craft-and-tourism cluster plus drip-irrigated groundnut. The state grant can fund only one package for three years. The district must also decide what to do about the 1,150 workers during transition.
1. Classify each proposed package by sector, and assess which is more consistent with the district's resource constraints.
Read the worked answer
The mill subsidy is secondary-sector support: it would sustain ginning and textile employment and buy cotton, but it does not reverse groundwater decline. The craft-and-tourism cluster is tertiary, with some household manufacturing; the drip-irrigated groundnut is primary. On resource constraints, expanding cotton has already increased acreage by 18% while groundwater falls 1.3 m per year, so a package that entangles the district further in cotton and water use is risky. Tourism is seasonal but uses the fort asset and can generate off-farm income without much water. Drip groundnut reduces water per hectare but does not create many jobs. The mill subsidy may protect 1,150 jobs, including 38% women, yet it keeps the district dependent on a volatile cotton chain. The tourism-craft package is more consistent with water scarcity, but only if it is not oversold as a full replacement for mill employment.
2. Compare the employment and gender implications of the two packages.
Read the worked answer
The mill offers 1,150 relatively formal jobs, with 38% women, and supports ginning and transport. Its closure would hit women workers and the cotton growers who sell 22% of output to it. The tourism-craft package offers only about 900 hotel and guide jobs, and tourism is concentrated in four months; craft and dairy work can be home-based and may employ women, but often at low and irregular pay. The drip-groundnut component may reduce labour demand and benefit larger farmers who can invest. Thus the mill package has a clearer immediate employment effect but a weak water and market rationale; the cluster has a better resource fit but weaker job security. A gender-sensitive judgement should ask not only how many jobs, but whether they are year-round, paid in cash, and accessible to women with care responsibilities.
3. Recommend a three-year transition strategy for the district. Explain how it handles the 1,150 mill workers.
Read the worked answer
Use the grant for the craft-and-tourism cluster plus drip groundnut, but make worker transition an explicit condition. In year 1, fund a retraining and placement cell for the 1,150 workers, with priority for the 38% women; negotiate with the mill owner for severance and a possible smaller processing unit. In year 2, develop the fort circuit for the November–February season and extend craft sales through SHGs; add a small groundnut oil-pressing unit so primary production links to secondary processing. In year 3, evaluate water savings and job placement before any expansion. This does not pretend that 900 seasonal tourism jobs equal 1,150 mill jobs. It combines resource relief with a realistic job bridge. The risk is that tourism income leaks to outside hotel chains, so local procurement and guide training should be conditions of the grant.