South Indian Bank Clerk study materials
South Indian Bank Clerk study resources

A Failed Cooperative Bank: How Much Is Actually Protected?

South Indian Bank Clerk · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Failed Cooperative Bank: How Much Is Actually Protected?

Meera held three accounts at Vanchi Cooperative Bank, which was placed under moratorium on 3 March. She had a savings account with ₹1,20,000, a fixed deposit of ₹3,50,000 on which ₹35,000 of interest had accrued but was unpaid, and a joint fixed deposit of ₹2,00,000 held with her mother at the same bank, where Meera is the second holder. The bank's licence has since been cancelled and the liquidator has invited claims from depositors. Meera also keeps a salary account at a public sector bank, which is unaffected. Separately, she had filed an online complaint with Vanchi Cooperative Bank 34 days ago about a ₹9,000 unauthorised debit on her savings account and has received no reply at all. She wants to know how much of her money is protected, what happens to the rest, and where she can take the unanswered complaint without engaging a lawyer.

1. Calculate how much Meera will actually receive under deposit insurance, and explain the aggregation rule you applied.

Read the worked answer

Her sole deposits in her own right: savings ₹1,20,000 + fixed deposit ₹3,50,000 + accrued interest ₹35,000 = ₹5,05,000.

The cover is ₹5,00,000 per depositor per bank, and it applies to principal plus interest together, with all branches and all deposit types of that bank aggregated. Savings and term deposits are not insured separately. Accrued but unpaid interest therefore counts inside the ceiling, not on top of it.

Her own deposits alone are ₹5,05,000, so the ceiling binds and she is paid ₹5,00,000.

The joint deposit needs care. Each joint holder is treated as a separate depositor for the limit, so the joint amount is reckoned in her own computation as well as in her mother's; even on the more conservative reading that only a share is attributed to her, her aggregate still exceeds ₹5,00,000. The conclusion is therefore safe either way: she receives ₹5,00,000 and nothing more from the insurer. The amount above the ceiling - at least ₹5,000 from her sole accounts - is not insured.

2. What happens to the uninsured amount, and what should Meera do about it in practice?

Read the worked answer

The uninsured balance does not disappear, but it changes character: Meera becomes an unsecured creditor of the bank in liquidation, ranking with the other depositors for whatever the liquidator realises from the bank's assets.

Practical steps:

  • File a proof of claim with the liquidator in the prescribed form, attaching statements for all three accounts and the interest computation. Do not wait for the insured amount to be settled first; the two claims run on separate tracks.
  • Keep the claim acknowledgement - recovery, if any, is paid as a dividend after assets are sold, and it can take years.
  • Note that the insurer's payment is made within the statutory window, but no further interest accrues on the insured amount once the cover is paid.
  • Do not pay any agent or 'recovery consultant' who offers to expedite the liquidator claim; the process is free and the claim form is public.

Expectation setting: the realistic recovery on the excess is partial and slow, often a fraction of the claim, so she should plan on the ₹5,00,000 being effectively the whole of what she sees in the near term. The same logic applies to her mother's claim on the joint deposit, which is assessed separately.

3. The ₹9,000 unauthorised-debit complaint has gone unanswered for 34 days at the bank. Where can Meera escalate, on what ground, and what should her complaint contain?

Read the worked answer

Forum: the RBI Ombudsman under the Reserve Bank – Integrated Ombudsman Scheme, 2021. Cooperative banks are regulated entities covered by the scheme, and the 'one nation, one ombudsman' structure means she files once, online, without needing to identify a regional office.

Ground: she gave the bank written notice and it has not replied within the 30-day period the scheme allows. Non-response, not disagreement, is enough to open the complaint. Filing is free and she does not need a lawyer.

Relief available: the Ombudsman can direct refund of the ₹9,000 with consequential compensation - the scheme's ceiling is ₹20 lakh for the main relief plus up to ₹1 lakh for expenses and loss of time.

What to attach: the original complaint with its date and reference, proof of despatch, the account statement showing the disputed debit, and a one-page chronology. She should keep the deposit-insurance claim separate - the insurer's payout is not an Ombudsman matter, and mixing the two slows both.

On the ₹9,000 itself: she should state when she first reported it, because liability for an unauthorised electronic transaction depends on how promptly the customer reported it.