TANCET MBA study materials
TANCET MBA study resources

TANCET MBA: Logical Reasoning

TANCET MBA · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Logical Reasoning

What TANCET tests here

Logical Reasoning covers syllogisms, blood relations, direction sense, seating and floor arrangements, coding-decoding, number and letter series, Venn diagrams, and verbal-critical items such as assumptions, conclusions and strong versus weak arguments. Most questions are solvable by a fixed procedure; accuracy depends on representing information cleanly.

Core rules

  • Syllogisms: draw the minimum Venn diagram that satisfies the statements. A conclusion follows only if it is true in every diagram; 'some' does not imply 'all', and 'some A are B' converts to 'some B are A'.
  • Blood relations: draw a family tree with gender marked; never reverse a relation ('A is B's father' does not make B the father).
  • Direction sense: fix north and track net displacement; use Pythagoras for shortest distance.
  • Seating: start with the most constrained clue; distinguish 'left of' from 'immediate left'.
  • Coding-decoding: test letter shifts, reversal and position sums before guessing.
  • Arguments: a strong argument must be relevant to the stated issue and must follow from the given facts, not from personal opinion.

Worked example

Statements: All analysts are planners. Some planners are coders. Conclusions: (I) Some analysts are coders. (II) Some coders are planners. Draw planners as a large circle containing analysts; place a coders circle overlapping planners but not necessarily analysts. Conclusion I is not forced - the coder-planner overlap may lie outside the analyst subset. Conclusion II is the valid conversion of 'Some planners are coders'. Only II follows.

Traps that cost marks

  • Treating a possible conclusion as a certain one.
  • Assuming every element in a seating puzzle is mentioned explicitly.
  • Reversing subject and object in blood-relation statements.
  • Ignoring 'only', 'at least' and 'all but' qualifiers.
  • In assumption questions, choosing a restatement of the argument instead of an unstated premise.