Tamil Nadu HSE First Year Political Science study materials
Tamil Nadu HSE First Year Political Science study resources

Island Statehood: Sanjeevi's Uncertain Sovereignty

Tamil Nadu HSE First Year Political Science · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Island Statehood: Sanjeevi's Uncertain Sovereignty

Sanjeevi is a 38-square-kilometre island off the coast of the fictional State of Marutham. Its 21,000 residents have an elected island council, a flag, a police force of 45 officers, and a constitution adopted in 2019. The island's port, airport, currency, and external defence are controlled by Marutham under a 1974 lease. Sanjeevi's council has applied to the United Nations for membership; 19 countries have signed trade agreements with it, but no permanent member of the Security Council recognises it. Marutham's Supreme Court has described Sanjeevi as an 'autonomous administrative zone'. A student group argues that Sanjeevi is already a state because it has population, territory, government, and a constitution. A visiting scholar replies that 'recognition is the fourth element'. The island council asks you to prepare a legal-political note on its status.

1. Which of the four traditional elements of statehood is most doubtful in Sanjeevi's case, and why? Apply each element briefly.

Read the worked answer

Applying the Montevideo elements: (i) population - 21,000 residents, satisfied; (ii) territory - 38 sq km, satisfied; (iii) government - an elected council and police, satisfied in form; (iv) capacity to enter into relations with other states - doubtful, because Marutham controls the port, airport, currency and external defence. A constitution and flag are evidence of self-government but not of sovereignty. The decisive missing element is independent sovereign authority: Sanjeevi can make local rules, but its external and monetary life is exercised by another state. Recognition by 19 trading partners is relevant but not a substitute for the fourth element. Conclusion: Sanjeevi is at most an autonomous dependency, not a full state under the traditional criteria.

2. Evaluate the scholar's statement that 'recognition is the fourth element' using declaratory and constitutive theories.

Read the worked answer

Declaratory theory: statehood exists once population, territory, government and independent capacity are present; recognition merely acknowledges a fact. On that view, Sanjeevi's lack of sovereignty, not lack of recognition, defeats statehood. Constitutive theory: recognition by other states creates international personality; an entity cannot act as a state until admitted into international society. The scholar's statement mixes the two. Modern practice is neither pure: UN membership requires Security Council recommendation and General Assembly vote, and many states treat recognition as strong evidence. But recognition cannot cure a total absence of governmental independence. Nineteen trade agreements show limited external capacity; no permanent Security Council member recognises Sanjeevi. Therefore recognition is evidentiary and politically important, not a mechanical 'fourth element' that can convert a dependent territory into a state.

3. What strategy should the island council adopt to clarify or improve its status?

Read the worked answer

First, clarify the 1974 lease: is it an international treaty, a domestic arrangement, or a revocable delegation? If Marutham can terminate it unilaterally, capacity is weak. Second, seek a negotiated status - autonomous province, associated state, or free port - with defined powers over currency, customs and defence. Third, build recognition through regional organisations and bilateral agreements, but avoid a unilateral declaration of independence that would invite legal challenge. Fourth, document historical title and the wishes of residents; a referendum observed by neutral bodies would strengthen the claim. Fifth, if Marutham resists, use peaceful dispute settlement - mediation, arbitration if the lease provides, or an advisory opinion if available. The council should not argue 'we have a flag, therefore we are a state'; it should argue concrete powers and international capacity.