Marking Three Readings of an Unseen Poem
Your class is preparing answers to an unseen poem for the half-yearly examination. The poem, printed below, carries 5 marks; the question is 'What is the poem about? Support your answer with evidence.'
The neem tree by the school gate has kept its shade for forty years. It has heard the bell, the shouted names, the scrape of sandals, the hush of fears. Last monsoon the roof came down; the tree stood still. The masons came and poured a concrete yard, and now the roots have nowhere else to go.
Sana writes: 'It is about a neem tree that has stood at the school gate for forty years.' Vikram writes: 'It is about what a school loses when it pours concrete over an old tree.' A third student, Farah, writes: 'The poet hates the masons for killing the tree.' The teacher asks you to mark all three and then explain the marking to the class tomorrow.
1. Which answer should receive the full 5 marks, and how would you move Sana's answer up without telling her that she is wrong?
Read the worked answer
Vikram's answer earns the full 5 marks: it states a subject beyond the object (loss, not just a tree) and it is anchored in the poem's turn - 'the masons came / and poured a concrete yard' - and its consequence, 'the roots have nowhere else to go'. A 5-mark unseen-poem answer is normally marked for subject plus theme plus evidence plus a comment on how the language works, and Vikram supplies three of the four.
Sana's answer is not wrong, only literal. She has named the tree and the forty years, which are in the text, and stopped where the poem begins to mean something. To move her up, ask two questions rather than supplying the answer: 'Which two lines made the poet write the last line?' and 'The tree has heard the bell and the hush of fears - can a tree hear? What does the poet gain by saying so?' Her answer then becomes: the tree is a witness to forty years of school life, and concreting the yard takes away not only shade but the place where that memory sat. That reaches 4 marks with her own words intact.
2. Mark Farah's answer. Name the error precisely, and write the two-sentence comment you would put on her script.
Read the worked answer
Farah should receive 0 or, at most, 1 mark - not for being wrong about the loss, but for asserting something the poem does not say.
The error is over-reading: attributing an attitude to the poet that the words do not carry. The poem reports the masons' actions in flat, factual verbs - 'came', 'poured' - and offers no evaluative adjective, no exclamation, no word of blame. The feeling of loss is created through the tree ('stood still', 'nowhere else to go'), not through the masons' character. Further, the poem does not say the tree dies; 'nowhere else to go' conveys confinement. Farah has also converted a feeling of loss into a feeling of hatred, which is a different emotion.
Comment on script: 'You are right that something is lost here, and that instinct would earn you marks. But the poem never tells us how the poet feels about the masons - show me one word that blames them, or rewrite your answer around what the concrete does to the roots.'
This keeps the valid insight and sends her back to the text rather than to a mood.
3. A student asks why the poet did not simply write 'and now the tree cannot grow'. Explain the effect of the actual last line, naming one poetic device and one effect on the reader.
Read the worked answer
The actual line - 'the roots have nowhere else to go' - is better for three connected reasons.
It personifies the roots. 'Nowhere else to go' is what we say of a person who has been turned out of a place, not of a root system. The reader is made to feel the tree's situation as a kind of homelessness, which is warmer and sadder than a statement about growth.
It withholds the conclusion. 'Cannot grow' tells the reader what to think and closes the poem. The real line gives the condition and lets the reader supply the consequence, which is why the poem stays with you after the last word - the reader has done the work.
'Else' compresses the history. The word quietly assumes there was somewhere before, so the forty years and the concrete yard are packed into three syllables without repetition.
Tell the student to notice also the position: it is the only line that ends on consequence, and the flat 'and now' makes it sound like a report rather than a lament - which is what makes it moving.