UPMSP High School Mobile-Phone Repair - Code 980 study materials
UPMSP High School Mobile-Phone Repair - Code 980 study resources

Cracked Screen Warranty Dispute

UPMSP High School Mobile-Phone Repair - Code 980 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Cracked Screen Warranty Dispute

A neighbourhood shop replaces a 6.5-inch LCD on a customer's phone for ₹1,200, with a written 30-day warranty that covers display defects only and excludes physical damage. Ten days later the customer returns with a cracked screen and says it cracked in his pocket without dropping it. The intake note records 'screen working, minor scratch on frame' and the customer signed the warranty terms. The replacement screen cost the shop ₹650; labour is 45 minutes; the shop's average repair margin is ₹350 and fixed costs are ₹28,000 per month across about 90 repairs. The customer has brought 12 phones to the shop in two years and threatens a one-star review if the replacement is not free. He also asks for a free tempered glass. The technician sees a small impact mark at the corner and a spiderweb crack spreading from it.

1. Decide whether the warranty covers the crack; explain the evidence and the risk of both approving and refusing.

Read the worked answer

The warranty does not cover this crack. It covers display defects, not physical damage, and the evidence points to impact: a small mark at the corner with a spiderweb pattern spreading from that point is characteristic of a local impact. A defect crack usually starts at an edge or along a stress line without an impact mark. The signed terms and the intake note support the shop's position.

Approving the claim would set a precedent: other customers could expect free replacements for accidental damage, and the shop would lose the ₹650 part plus 45 minutes of labour each time. Refusing bluntly also carries risk: this is a repeat customer with 12 phones in two years, and a public one-star review in a neighbourhood market can cost more than one screen. The right decision is to reject the warranty claim but handle it as a goodwill case: show the impact mark, explain the difference between a defect and a drop, and offer a reduced-price repair rather than a free one.

2. Calculate the direct financial effect of a free replacement versus a 50% parts-only goodwill offer; include the value of the repeat customer.

Read the worked answer

Free replacement: the shop pays ₹650 for the part and gives 45 minutes of labour, with no revenue. If labour is valued at the average repair margin of ₹350, the economic cost is about ₹650 + ₹350 = ₹1,000.

50% parts-only offer: the customer pays ₹325, so the shop bears ₹650 − ₹325 = ₹325 for the part, plus the 45 minutes of labour. That is a direct cost of about ₹325 plus labour, or roughly ₹675 if labour is valued at ₹350. An at-cost offer of ₹650 for the part with free labour would recover the part cost and cost only the labour.

Repeat-customer value: 12 phones × ₹350 average margin = ₹4,200 over two years, or about ₹2,100 per year, before referrals. A ₹325–₹650 concession is smaller than that lifetime value, so a goodwill discount is rational if it keeps the customer. But it must not become the default policy for every cracked screen; the shop should offer it as a one-time decision and record it. A free tempered glass costing about ₹30 is a cheap extra that makes the offer feel fair without giving away the screen.

3. Draft the conversation and the record you would keep, including a policy change to prevent repeats.

Read the worked answer

Conversation: 'I understand why you are upset. Let us look at the screen together. The warranty covers display faults, but this crack starts from a small impact mark at the corner, so it is physical damage and not a warranty case. I cannot replace it free, but because you have been a regular customer, I can offer the screen at cost - ₹650 with free fitting today - and include a tempered glass. That is the best I can do without changing the warranty for everyone.' I would avoid arguing about the pocket story and let the evidence speak.

Record: date, customer name, phone model and IMEI, the original invoice and signed warranty terms, the intake note, a photograph of the impact mark and crack, the customer's statement, the offer made, the amount charged, and a new warranty for the paid repair. Policy change: make the warranty card explicitly exclude cracks, drops and liquid damage; inspect the phone with the customer present and mark existing frame damage; offer tempered glass at the time of repair; train staff to use the same script; and keep a log of goodwill decisions so the shop can see whether they are being abused.