A Small Branch where 'Everyone Trusts Ramesh'
At the Rajpur branch of a 14-store retail chain, monthly cash sales average ₹6,00,000 and credit sales ₹4,00,000. One cashier, Shri Ramesh, receives cash, prepares the daily sales summary, issues receipts from ordinary notepads, deposits cash at the bank, maintains the customers' ledger and prepares the bank reconciliation. The branch manager approves all credit sales and is the only person who can sanction write-offs. Internal audit for 2024-25 noted: bank deposits were made two to four days after collection on 18 of 60 test days; six receipt numbers in the branch's own list could not be traced; four customers complained that payments made in January were still shown as outstanding in March; and a year-end cash shortage of ₹18,000 was written off as 'cash short' with the manager's approval. The branch's salesmen both collect cash from credit customers and issue stock from the godown. Management says the branch is small and 'everyone trusts Ramesh', so no changes are needed.
1. Identify the internal control weaknesses in the branch and classify each by type (segregation of duties, custody versus record, authorisation, documentation, independent verification).
Read the worked answer
| Finding | Weakness | Type |
|---|---|---|
| One person receives cash, records sales, deposits cash, keeps the debtors ledger and reconciles the bank | Custody, recording and verification all in one hand; fraud can be committed and concealed | Segregation of duties; custody versus record |
| Receipts issued from ordinary notepads, six numbers untraced | No pre-numbered, accounted-for stationery; collections can go unrecorded | Documentation |
| Deposits 2-4 days late on 18 of 60 days | Cash held by the cashier; scope for teeming and lading and for loss | Custody; timing control |
| Manager approves credit sales and alone sanctions write-offs | Concentration of authority; no credit-limit control by finance; write-offs can hide misappropriation | Authorisation |
| Salesmen collect cash and also issue stock | Custody of cash and custody of goods combined, with no independent billing | Segregation; custody |
| ₹18,000 'cash short' written off with the manager's approval | No investigation, no independent approval of shortages | Authorisation; independent verification |
| Bank reconciliation prepared by the cashier | No independent check of the branch's own records | Independent verification |
The four customer complaints are the symptom: payments received are not being recorded against the right accounts, which is consistent with delayed banking and unrecorded receipts.
2. Design an internal check system for cash sales and for credit sales and collection at the branch, specifying documents, responsibilities and frequency.
Read the worked answer
Cash sales
- Pre-numbered, triplicate receipt books, issued to the cashier against signature and accounted for daily; missing numbers reported in writing.
- Cash deposited on the next banking day at the latest, with stamped deposit slips filed serially.
- Daily cash summary prepared by the cashier and independently agreed to the receipt book and deposit slips by the branch accountant, who does not handle cash.
- Surprise cash counts by internal audit at irregular intervals; shortages investigated, not written off by the manager alone.
Credit sales and collection
- Credit limits set by head office finance; the branch manager may approve sales only within the limit, and exceptions go to head office.
- Salesmen issue stock only against an authorised, pre-numbered invoice and a gate pass; godown and cash collection duties are separated.
- Customers pay into the company's bank account or by UPI where possible; where cash is collected, a pre-numbered receipt is issued and the salesman's collection sheet is agreed to the debtors ledger by an independent clerk.
- Debtors ledger maintained at head office or by a clerk who does not handle cash; monthly statements to customers; ageing reviewed monthly.
- Write-offs and discounts approved by head office, not by the branch manager who approves the sale.
- Reconciliation of the branch bank account prepared monthly by an independent person and reviewed at head office.
3. As statutory auditor, explain how these findings affect risk assessment, the nature, timing and extent of procedures, and whether they require a qualified audit report.
Read the worked answer
Risk assessment. The branch has almost no segregation of duties and no independent verification, so the risk of material misstatement - especially fraud risk in revenue recognition and cash - is assessed as high. The complaints, untraced receipts, late deposits and unexplained shortage are specific indicators, not merely theoretical weaknesses.
Procedures. Because controls cannot be relied on, the auditor sets control risk high and adopts a substantive approach:
- Obtain bank statements and confirmations directly from the bank, not through Ramesh.
- Vouch a larger sample of receipts from the counterfoil/receipt list to deposit slips and the cash book, and test the numerical sequence for missing receipts.
- Send external confirmations to credit customers, including the four who complained, and reconcile their balances.
- Perform cut-off testing around 31 March on sales and cash in transit, and investigate the ₹18,000 write-off.
- Review journal entries and write-offs for unusual approvals.
Communication and reporting. Under SA 265, significant deficiencies in internal control are reported in writing to those charged with governance; under SA 240, the fraud indicators are discussed with management and, where appropriate, with the board. A control weakness on its own does not justify a qualified opinion. The opinion is modified only if uncorrected misstatements are material, or if the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence (for example, if management refuses access to bank confirmations or the debtors' records), in which case a qualified or disclaimer of opinion follows under SA 705.