Correcting a Block Office Circular on PMAY-G Beneficiary Selection
The Block Development Office has drafted a circular for Gram Pradhans. The draft reads: ‘All the Gram Pradhans are hereby informed that the meeting regarding selection of beneficiaries under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Gramin) will be held on 12 July 2025 at 11:00 AM in the Block Development Office. The beneficiaries list have been prepared by the concerned VDO. It is requested to all members that they must bring their Aadhaar card and bank passbook. Any objection should be submit before the meeting. The meeting will be presided by the Block Development Officer.’ The office assistant flags four problems: one subject–verb agreement error, one preposition error in a passive construction, one wrong verb form after a modal, and one ambiguous phrase about ‘objection’. The circular must be issued tomorrow, and the Block Development Officer wants the meaning kept unchanged.
1. Identify the four flagged errors, correct them, and name the grammatical problem in each.
Read the worked answer
- ‘The beneficiaries list have been prepared’ → ‘The beneficiary list has been prepared’. The head noun ‘list’ is singular, so the verb must be ‘has’. If the intended meaning is several lists, write ‘The lists of beneficiaries have been prepared’.
- ‘It is requested to all members’ → ‘All members are requested’ or ‘It is requested that all members…’. The verb ‘request’ does not take the preposition ‘to’ before the person requested in this structure.
- ‘should be submit’ → ‘should be submitted’. After the modal ‘should’, the passive requires ‘be’ plus the past participle, not the base form.
- ‘presided by’ → ‘presided over by’. The standard passive construction is ‘presided over by’. A further polish is ‘All Gram Pradhans’ rather than ‘All the Gram Pradhans’, but the four flagged problems are the ones above.
2. Explain the ambiguity in ‘Any objection should be submit before the meeting’ and rewrite the sentence so that the deadline is unambiguous.
Read the worked answer
The phrase ‘before the meeting’ can mean before the meeting begins on 12 July at 11:00 AM, or at any time before the meeting is held, including the previous day or week. That ambiguity matters because a person who submits an objection at 10:55 AM may claim compliance while the office may have intended a earlier deadline. A clear rewrite is: ‘Any objection, with reasons, must be submitted in writing to this office by 5:00 PM on 11 July 2025.’ This fixes both the mode and the exact cut-off and removes the dispute.
3. A clerk says the circular is ‘only a notice’ and grammar does not matter. Give a reasoned reply using one example from the draft.
Read the worked answer
Grammar and clarity affect legal effect, not just style. For example, ‘should be submit’ is visibly wrong, but the more serious problem is ‘before the meeting’. If the office later rejects an objection filed on the morning of the meeting, the objector can rely on the circular's own wording to argue that the objection was in time. A grammatically correct and time-specific sentence prevents that dispute. Similarly, ‘The beneficiaries list have been prepared’ creates doubt about whether one list or several lists exist, which can affect claims of exclusion. A notice that creates rights and deadlines should be treated as an administrative document, not as informal correspondence.