WBP Constable study materials
WBP Constable study resources

Measurement Failure at the Recruitment PET

WBP Constable · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Measurement Failure at the Recruitment PET

You are assisting the physical measurement and efficiency test board at a recruitment ground. A male candidate, aged 24, produces a certificate showing he is from Kolkata. His measurements are: height 165.0 cm; chest 79.0 cm with 4.0 cm expansion. The call letter states the notified standards: minimum height 167.64 cm; minimum chest 78.74 cm with a minimum expansion of 5 cm; 1600 m run to be completed in 6 minutes 30 seconds; long jump minimum 3.65 m. A 5 cm height relaxation applies only to candidates from the hill districts, which he is not. There is no re-measurement. One retest in the run is allowed only if the first attempt is within 15 seconds of the qualifying time. In his first run he clocks 7 minutes 5 seconds; his long jump is 3.20 m.

1. State which standards the candidate meets and fails, and whether he should be allowed to proceed as a qualified candidate.

Read the worked answer

He meets the chest circumference minimum, because 79.0 cm is above 78.74 cm, but he fails the required expansion: 4.0 cm against 5 cm. He fails height, 165.0 cm against 167.64 cm, and the hill-district relaxation does not apply to a Kolkata candidate. He fails the long jump, 3.20 m against 3.65 m, and his run time, 7:05 against 6:30. Since there is no re-measurement and the measurement failures are disqualifying, he should not proceed as a qualified candidate. The run and long jump results cannot cure the height and chest-expansion failures.

2. Compute the even pace per 400 m needed for 6:30 and compare it with his 7:05. If he runs the first 800 m at his current average pace, what must the second 800 m be?

Read the worked answer

6:30 is 390 seconds for 1600 m, so the average per 400 m is 97.5 seconds, i.e. 1 minute 37.5 seconds, or 4:03.75 per km. His 7:05 is 425 seconds, so he is 35 seconds too slow overall, about 8.75 seconds per 400 m. His current average per 800 m is 212.5 seconds, or 3:32.5. If he runs the first 800 m at that pace, he must run the second 800 m in 390 − 212.5 = 177.5 seconds, i.e. 2 minutes 57.5 seconds, which is far faster than his current average. The arithmetic shows that an even improvement of about 8.75 seconds per 400 m is more realistic than trying to sprint the second half.

3. The board has one spare slot and a six-week coaching camp. Give a reasoned recommendation on whether he should be admitted to the camp or rejected at the measurement stage.

Read the worked answer

Reject him at the measurement stage. Height and chest expansion are not fitness variables that a six-week camp can change, and the rules provide no re-measurement or category relaxation for him. Admitting him would consume a spare slot that could go to a candidate who meets the notified standards, and it would expose the board to a challenge of unequal treatment. If the board has discretion to allow a non-qualifying candidate to train without claiming a slot, that is a separate administrative decision; it should not be presented as a route to qualification. The fair and defensible course is to record the measurements, inform him of the specific failures, and follow the prescribed appeal or review procedure, if any.