The Laneway That Wasn't on the Folio
A solicitor acts for purchasers of a 1930s Dublin semi-detached house. Contracts were signed on 14 March, with a deposit of €45,000 (10%) and closing fixed for 28 April. Title is registered in the vendor's sole name. On 3 April the purchasers' engineer reports that the rear boundary wall stands 0.8 metres inside the folio boundary. The adjoining owner has used a 1.2-metre laneway at the rear for 25 years to reach a shed, and the folio shows no right-of-way burden. The vendor's solicitor calls the folio map 'indicative' and produces a neighbour's statutory declaration saying the use was 'by permission'. The vendor refuses to reduce the price, execute a deed of waiver, or extend the closing date. The purchasers have mortgage approval expiring on 30 April and have served notice to quit their rented flat. They want to know whether they must close, can rescind, or can retain money.
1. Does the neighbour's 25-year use create an enforceable right of way, and how should the purchasers' solicitor assess the statutory declaration?
Read the worked answer
An easement by prescription requires use 'as of right' - without force, without secrecy and without permission. The neighbour's 25 years could support a claim under the Prescription Act 1850 or the doctrine of lost modern grant, but the statutory declaration saying the use was 'by permission' is fatal to that claim if it is accurate: permission makes the use precarious, not as of right. The declaration is not conclusive. The purchasers' solicitor should not simply accept it: examine the neighbour, ask for the dates and terms of permission, check old maps and photographs, inspect the laneway, and search the folio and Registry of Deeds. On registered land, a prescriptive easement is not automatically shown on the folio and may not bind a purchaser unless protected by registration or an overriding interest. The solicitor should treat the risk as unresolved and require either a deed of waiver or release from the neighbour, or a title indemnity policy, plus a retention. A bare declaration from a neighbour with an interest to claim is weak evidence.
2. Can the purchasers rescind or must they complete and sue for damages? Consider the contract, the doctrine of merger, and the practical closing date.
Read the worked answer
Before closing, the purchasers have the stronger position. The contract requires the vendor to show good marketable title; the purchasers can raise a requisition or objection and, if the defect is substantial and not cured, rescind and recover the deposit. If the defect is minor, a court may order specific performance with compensation, but a possible unregistered right of way over the rear of the house is not obviously minor. The critical trap is merger: once the purchasers close and take the deed, the contract merges into the conveyance and they lose the right to sue on known title defects. Because they already know of the laneway, closing 'under protest' without an express written reservation is risky. The mortgage expiry and notice to quit are commercial pressures, not legal obligations to complete. The practical answer is: do not close on 28 April unless the vendor provides a clean release or waiver, a satisfactory title indemnity, or a substantial retention (for example €50,000) held by the vendor's solicitor. If the vendor refuses all, rescind in writing and claim the deposit; alternatively negotiate an extension.
3. What practical steps should the purchasers' solicitor take before 28 April?
Read the worked answer
Issue formal requisitions on title immediately and put the vendor on notice that time is not of the essence until the objection is answered. Obtain the full folio and map, the neighbour's statement, any correspondence about permission, and planning records for the laneway and shed. Ask the neighbour to confirm in a deed whether any right is claimed; if a right is claimed, quantify it and consider a deed of release for value. Get a title indemnity quote and check whether the lender will accept it. If the purchaser still wants the property, negotiate a special condition: closing subject to a retention or an undertaking from the vendor's solicitor to discharge the risk. Notify the lender of the title issue and the proposed solution. Do not serve notice to quit the rented flat until contracts are unconditional, and preserve the deposit by insisting it is held by the vendor's solicitor as stakeholder, not released to the vendor.