The Farm, the Widow and the Will
Padraig died in January 2024. He was survived by his wife Eileen, to whom he had been married for 30 years, and three adult children: Sean, Aoife and Niamh. His will, made in 2018, leaves the 120-acre farm worth €1.2 million to Sean, and the family home to Eileen. The family home was in fact jointly owned by Padraig and Eileen and passes by survivorship. The farm is in Padraig's sole name and carries a mortgage of €200,000. The will contains no other gifts. Eileen has a pension of €28,000 a year and owns a small apartment. Aoife worked on the farm for 20 years for low wages and gave up a college place; she has no other assets. Sean says the will is 'sacred' and offers Aoife €20,000. Niamh has a well-paid job and wants nothing. The executor wants to distribute the estate within 12 months.
1. What is Eileen's legal right share, and how does the jointly owned home affect it?
Read the worked answer
Eileen is a spouse and there are children, so her legal right share is one-third of Padraig's estate. The family home is not part of the estate: it was jointly owned and passes to Eileen by survivorship, so the will's gift of the home to her has no effect. That does not reduce her legal right share. The estate for this purpose is the farm worth €1.2 million less the €200,000 mortgage, i.e. about €1.0 million. One-third is approximately €333,000. Eileen may elect to take her legal right share in preference to the will; because the will gives her no share of the farm, she should claim it. Her pension and apartment are irrelevant to the legal right share, although they may be relevant if she also sought provision. The executor must satisfy the legal right share before distributing the farm to Sean. Eileen could agree to take a cash sum or an appropriation of part of the farm, but she cannot be forced to accept the jointly owned home as satisfaction.
2. Can Aoife apply under section 117 of the Succession Act 1965, and what factors will the court consider?
Read the worked answer
Aoife can apply under section 117 of the Succession Act 1965 on the ground that the will fails to make proper provision for her. The application must be made within six months after the first grant of representation, unless the court extends the time. The court considers the testator's means, the applicant's age, financial position and needs, the number of children, and any contribution by the applicant to the testator's property. Aoife's 20 years of low-paid work on the farm and her lost college place are strong factors. The €20,000 offer is likely to be inadequate, but the court will not automatically give her a share of the farm; it may order a lump sum or a transfer of part of the land. Eileen's legal right share is calculated first, so Aoife's claim is against what remains. The executor should not distribute the estate until the six-month period has expired or Aoife's claim is resolved. Sean's view that the will is 'sacred' is not the legal test.
3. How should the executor deal with the mortgage, the farm and the competing claims?
Read the worked answer
The executor should first obtain probate and establish the net estate. The farm is an asset of the estate subject to the mortgage. The executor must pay the mortgage or arrange for Sean to take over the debt; Sean has no automatic right to the farm until debts, the legal right share and any section 117 order are satisfied. The executor should notify Eileen and Aoife of their claims and consider a family settlement. If Eileen claims her legal right share, the executor may need to sell part of the farm or transfer land to her by appropriation, with her consent. If Aoife issues section 117 proceedings, the executor should seek the court's directions and retain assets. The executor should not transfer the farm to Sean within 12 months merely because the will says so. A sale by the executor as personal representative can give good title, but the mortgage and claims must be cleared first.