The Bike-Lane Letter
A student, Tomas, is analyzing a letter to the editor about a proposed three-block bike lane. The letter says: “The city’s plan is bold-if bold means removing fourteen parking spaces so that a handful of cyclists can glide past the bakery. Supporters gathered 200 signatures, which is impressive until you recall that the city has 48,000 residents. I do not doubt the good intentions of the cycling group. I do doubt that a three-block lane will reduce traffic enough to justify the lost parking. The council should test the idea for six months, not adopt it permanently on a wave of enthusiasm.” Tomas must choose the author’s tone from “hostile,” “mildly mocking but open to a trial,” and “enthusiastic.” He picks “hostile” because of the word “handful.”
1. Identify the author’s tone and explain why “hostile” overreads the passage.
Read the worked answer
The tone is mildly mocking but open to a trial, not hostile. The mocking appears in “bold-if bold means” and “impressive until you recall,” which use irony to shrink the supporters’ claim. But the author also concedes, “I do not doubt the good intentions of the cycling group,” and ends with a concrete alternative: “test the idea for six months.” Hostility would aim to defeat the plan outright or attack motives. This author attacks the scale of the evidence and the permanence of the proposal, not the people. Tomas overreads because “handful” sounds dismissive. Tone questions require the whole passage, especially concessions and proposals. The final sentence is the strongest evidence of a pragmatic, not hostile, stance.
2. How do the numbers 14, 200, 48,000, and “three-block” function rhetorically?
Read the worked answer
The numbers do rhetorical work. “Fourteen parking spaces” makes the cost concrete and local. “200 signatures” initially sounds impressive, but “48,000 residents” reframes it as less than half a percent, deflating the supporters’ mandate. “Three-block” repeatedly emphasizes small scale, which supports the author’s claim that a permanent change is premature. The numbers are not neutral data; they are selected to make the proposal seem modest in benefit and real in cost. At the same time, the specific six-month trial shows the author is not simply anti-bike. A good analysis names both the persuasive effect and the purpose: to urge the council to slow down and test, not to reject cycling.
3. What is the author’s purpose, and how does the final sentence reveal it?
Read the worked answer
The purpose is to persuade the city council to adopt a six-month trial rather than permanent adoption. The author is not trying to ban bicycles or insult cyclists; the concession about good intentions and the trial proposal rule that out. The letter uses irony to question the strength of the supporters’ case, then offers a practical alternative. That combination is typical of a local-opinion piece: criticize the process, propose a compromise. If the purpose were simply to entertain, the six-month proposal would be unnecessary. If it were to attack the cycling group, the concession would undercut it. Purpose questions should be stated as an action the author wants the audience to take.