ITIL 4 SRM study materials
ITIL 4 SRM study resources

ITIL 4 SRM: Service Request Management value streams, processes, and people (roles and competencies)

ITIL 4 SRM · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Service Request Management value streams, processes, and people (roles and competencies)

Domain 2: Value streams, processes, and people

This domain tests the end-to-end flow from request to fulfilment, the design of request models, and the roles and competencies needed to operate them.

Core rules

  • The request-to-fulfil value stream moves demand through: request capture, validation, authorization, fulfilment, verification, closure, and feedback.
  • Request models make the flow repeatable: they define eligibility, required data, approvals, fulfilment steps, target times, dependencies, and escalation.
  • Prioritization for requests should follow agreed service levels and request-model targets, not incident impact and urgency unless a request is also an incident.
  • Roles include requestor, service desk agent, approver or authorizer, fulfiller, service owner, practice owner, and catalogue manager. A person may hold several roles, but accountability must be clear.
  • Competencies include catalogue and service knowledge, clear communication, empathy, authorization judgement, security awareness, accurate data handling, and knowing when to escalate.
  • Automation and self-service move routine fulfilment away from agents; people then handle exceptions, advice, and assurance.

Worked example

A new starter needs a laptop. The request model is triggered by HR onboarding, requires manager approval, selects a standard build, reserves an asset, and sets a five-day target. The service desk validates the request and coordinates; the fulfilment team images and ships the device; the requestor confirms receipt. A request for a non-standard high-specification device does not fit the model, so it follows a separate approval and change route rather than bypassing controls.

Traps that cost marks

  • Designing a request model with no approval or target times.
  • Treating request priority as identical to incident priority.
  • Leaving ownership unclear between service desk and fulfilment teams.
  • Closing before the user confirms fulfilment, or without verification.
  • Assuming automation removes the need for governance and exception handling.