The Courthouse Sidewalk Permit: Content Neutrality and the Preliminary Injunction
Riverton City Code § 12-40 requires any group of 25 or more persons to obtain a police permit at least 14 days before a 'public assembly' on any sidewalk within 300 feet of the county courthouse. The application asks for the group's name and the 'purpose and content of the intended message.' The Chief of Police may deny a permit if the assembly 'would interfere with the administration of justice or would be inconsistent with community standards of decency.' Students Against Mandatory Minimums (SAMM) applied 16 days before a planned 60-person rally, attaching a flyer reading 'Sentencing Should Serve Rehabilitation, Not Revenge.' The Chief denied the permit, citing the flyer's 'anti-law-enforcement tone' and the risk that 'courthouse visitors might be offended.' SAMM sues in federal court and moves for a preliminary injunction nine days before the rally. The City responds that § 12-40 is a valid time, place, and manner regulation and that SAMM delayed too long to seek emergency relief.
1. Is § 12-40 content-neutral? Identify the specific textual features that drive your analysis, and state the tier of scrutiny that applies.
Read the worked answer
Start with the forum. A municipal sidewalk surrounding a courthouse is a traditional public forum; sidewalks adjacent to government buildings are not converted into nonpublic forums merely because the building houses courts. In a traditional public forum, the government may impose content-neutral time, place, and manner rules that are narrowly tailored to a significant interest, leave ample alternative channels, and contain adequate standards to prevent arbitrary application. Content-based rules get strict scrutiny.
Section 12-40 fails at the threshold. Two features are decisive. First, the application demands the 'purpose and content of the intended message.' A permitting scheme whose application turns on what the applicant intends to say is content-based on its face; the City cannot administer the ordinance without reading the speech. Second, 'inconsistent with community standards of decency' and 'interfere with the administration of justice' supply no objective benchmarks. Discretion to decide what offends the community is the classic vice condemned in cases involving unbridled licensing: it invites viewpoint discrimination and chills protected speech. The actual denial confirms the risk - the Chief cited tone, not traffic, noise, or courthouse access.
Because the ordinance classifies by content, strict scrutiny applies, and the City cannot show a compelling interest in shielding courthouse visitors from an unwelcome message. Even if a court recast the ordinance as content-neutral, the absence of narrow, objective, definite standards would invalidate it as applied. Answer the tier question directly: strict scrutiny, not intermediate.
2. Apply the preliminary injunction standard. How should the court treat the City's laches argument?
Read the worked answer
The four factors are likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, the balance of equities, and the public interest. On the first, SAMM's facial challenge is strong for the reasons above; a plaintiff who shows a likely violation of a First Amendment right rarely loses this factor.
Irreparable harm is presumed when a constitutional right is threatened; the loss of the chance to speak on a scheduled date cannot be repaired with money afterward. The nine-day filing interval does not defeat that. The ordinance itself compresses the timeline by requiring a 14-day lead, so a challenge filed within the permit cycle is prompt by design. Laches requires unreasonable delay plus prejudice; a nine-day gap between denial and suit is not unreasonable, and courts are especially reluctant to apply laches against facial challenges to licensing schemes, because the doctrine would let a municipality moot review by denying permits close to the event date. The City's prejudice is thin: it faces only an order permitting a 60-person sidewalk rally that it could regulate through neutral time, place, and manner conditions.
The balance and public interest favor the injunction. The City retains a legitimate interest in courtroom access and security, but that interest can be served by narrow measures (a defined route, a decibel cap, a cap on crowd size), not by silencing a message. A court that denies relief because of a nine-day delay effectively immunizes short-fuse permit denials.
3. What is the appropriate scope of relief, and what should the injunction say?
Read the worked answer
Relief should be no broader than necessary to cure the constitutional defect but broad enough to prevent its repetition. Three options exist, and a court should reason to one rather than reflexively enjoin the ordinance in full.
First, the court could enjoin enforcement of § 12-40 against SAMM and order the City to issue the permit, attaching neutral conditions drawn from the City's legitimate interests (route, hours, crowd size, amplified sound). This is the narrowest remedy and fits the as-applied denial.
Second, the court could facially invalidate the offensive provisions - the demand for message content and the 'community standards of decency' clause - while severing and preserving any neutral portions if state law permits severance. Severability analysis matters: if the remaining text still gives the Chief discretion to deny based on 'interference with the administration of justice,' severance accomplishes little, and the whole permit scheme should fall as applied to expressive assemblies in this forum.
Third, the injunction should bar the City from requiring SAMM to disclose its message as a condition of any future permit, and should not be limited to the single scheduled date, because the same group is likely to apply again.
A preliminary injunction is not a final merits ruling; the court should state findings on likelihood of success and irreparable harm under Rule 65 and require no more than nominal security, since the City faces no compensable loss from permitting speech it dislikes.