The Counterclaim That Exceeded the Ceiling
A newly gazetted Small Claims Court sits in a sub-county where no magistrate is stationed. A trader files a claim of KES 860,000 for goods sold and delivered, and adds a prayer for an injunction restraining the buyer from selling a lorry said to secure the debt. The buyer counterclaims KES 1,450,000, saying the goods were defective and that he lost a contract as a result. The same parties already have a pending suit in the Environment and Land Court over the parcel of land on which the lorry yard stands. The adjudicator, who is the only judicial officer at the station, is minded to hear everything together 'in the interest of justice and to avoid multiplicity of suits'. Counsel for the trader objects and asks that the file be transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court 70 km away. The Chief Registrar must advise on jurisdiction, case management and whether the station can operate without a magistrate.
1. Can the adjudicator hear the counterclaim, and what are the lawful options for dealing with it?
Read the worked answer
The Small Claims Court is a statutory court: it can hear only the claims the Act assigns to it, and its pecuniary ceiling is KES 1,000,000. The claim of KES 860,000 is within jurisdiction. A counterclaim is a separate claim for jurisdictional purposes; the Act does not permit the court to determine a counterclaim it could not have entertained as an original claim. At KES 1,450,000, the counterclaim exceeds the ceiling and cannot be decided by the adjudicator.
Consent, convenience or a desire to avoid multiplicity cannot enlarge statutory jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is conferred by law and withdrawn by law, and a judgment on an amount beyond the ceiling is a nullity liable to be set aside.
The lawful options are: the respondent abandons the excess above the ceiling and limits the counterclaim, in which case both may be heard; or the counterclaim is severed and filed in the Magistrates' Court with the appropriate pecuniary jurisdiction; or both claim and counterclaim are transferred so they are heard together in that court. The adjudicator should record the objection, invite the respondent to elect within a fixed time, and default to severance. She must not 'hear everything together' and then enter judgment on a sum she has no power to award.
2. What should happen to the injunction prayer and the overlap with the pending Environment and Land Court suit?
Read the worked answer
The injunction prayer takes the matter outside the court's design. The Small Claims Court's procedure is intended for simple money claims; the Act does not confer a general equitable jurisdiction to grant injunctions, nor power over title to or possession of land. A prayer restraining sale of a lorry said to secure a debt is, in substance, a claim for security over property and cannot be attached to a money claim so as to enlarge the court's powers.
The pending Environment and Land Court suit concerns land, which falls to that court. The adjudicator must not make findings that pre-empt it.
The correct course is to strike out or sever the injunctive prayer, direct the parties to pursue it in a court with jurisdiction, and case-manage the money claim alone. If the ELC's determination is genuinely necessary to resolve the debt, the money claim may be stayed. Article 159(2)(d) requires that procedure not defeat substance, but it cannot supply jurisdiction that the statute has withheld; the objection should be upheld without punishing the trader for the drafting.
3. Advise the Chief Registrar on whether a Small Claims Court station can operate where no magistrate is stationed.
Read the worked answer
Yes, in principle, but only if the statutory preconditions and the practical machinery are in place. A Small Claims Court is established for a station by notice, and its adjudicators need not be magistrates, so the absence of a magistrate is not fatal to its existence.
The Registrar should confirm: that an establishment has been created and a gazette notice issued for that station; that the adjudicator is properly appointed and has taken the prescribed oath; and that an appellate route and records transmission are workable, since appeals must be filed in the court the Act designates.
Practical gaps need bridging: service of process, execution of decrees and any committal powers require the machinery of a court with those powers. The Registrar should arrange either a service and execution arrangement with the nearest Magistrates' Court or a roving deputy registrar, so that decrees are not sterile. Where volume is low, part-time adjudicators may be appropriate.
Finally, the Registrar should report workload and staffing to the Commission and the Chief Justice so that resource allocation follows the establishment, rather than the station operating on improvisation.