The Annuity Request From a Client With Memory Lapses
Daniel, an adviser at a mid-sized firm, has serviced Mr. Okafor for nine years. Mr. Okafor is 79, was widowed eight months ago, and since a fall in March has shown short-term memory lapses; his physician's note mentions 'mild cognitive impairment, reassess in six months'. The client's IRA holds 620,000 USD. His stated goals have been steady income and leaving something to two grandchildren. Last week his daughter, who holds a general power of attorney, emailed asking the firm to move the entire IRA into a proprietary fixed index annuity paying the adviser 4.2% upfront and 0.9% annually, saying 'Dad agreed on the phone'. Daniel's branch manager has set a quarterly annuity quota, and the firm also pays a 0.5% referral fee to the accountant who introduced the client. When Daniel calls, Mr. Okafor sounds uncertain and asks whether 'the annuity is the safe one the bank sells'.
1. Identify the ethical and suitability problems in this request and state what Daniel must do before any paperwork is submitted.
Read the worked answer
Conflicts of interest are stacked on top of a substantive suitability problem.
- Compensation: 4.2% of 620,000 = 26,040 one-time, plus 0.9% = 5,580 a year, plus a 0.5% referral fee to the accountant. Daniel must disclose each in writing, in dollars, before a recommendation is made, and the firm must be able to demonstrate that the recommendation was in the client's interest.
- Sales pressure: a quarterly quota and a third-party referral fee are pressures that must not influence the recommendation; if the branch manager is directing the sale, Daniel escalates.
- Product fit: inside an IRA an annuity adds no tax deferral, since the IRA is already tax-deferred. It adds cost, caps and participation rates, a multi-year surrender period, and illiquidity. For a 79-year-old who needs income and wants a legacy, a transparent income portfolio (for example, a CD/bond ladder plus a diversified fund) at roughly 4-4.5% would produce about 25,000-28,000 a year with full liquidity and no surrender charge.
- Estate effect: the annuity changes what the grandchildren ultimately receive and may concentrate death-benefit value in the daughter's hands.
Before submitting anything: obtain the client's own instruction directly; verify the power of attorney and the firm's third-party authorisation file; document the capacity concern; run a written best-interest comparison against alternatives; and place the request on hold pending compliance review. Even with consent, Daniel must not recommend a product he cannot justify.
2. How should Daniel handle the daughter's power of attorney and the client's possible diminished capacity? What should be documented?
Read the worked answer
Authority and capacity are separate questions, and both must be answered before the trade.
The general power of attorney may authorise investment decisions, but Daniel must read it: many documents restrict gifting, beneficiary changes, or transfers to the agent, and a move of the whole IRA is a major, irreversible step. The agent must act in the donor's best interest, and here the agent is also the likely beneficiary, so the request carries an inherent conflict.
On capacity: a physician's note of mild cognitive impairment is a red flag, not a legal determination. Daniel should follow the firm's diminished-capacity protocol: meet Mr. Okafor in person without the daughter present; ask open questions about his income needs, his grandchildren, who helps with money and what he understands the annuity to be; and note his answers verbatim rather than a yes/no. A trusted contact person should be confirmed. With the client's consent, Daniel can ask the physician for a functional opinion on financial decision-making.
Document: the file note with date, time, who was present, exact questions and answers; the capacity screen result; the POA review; the disclosure acknowledgement; the compliance consultation; and the reason for proceeding or declining. If doubt persists, the correct action is to pause and let the agent and family resolve authority, not to execute a commission-generating transaction.
3. Draft the substance of the compensation disclosure Daniel owes the client, and explain how the annuity-in-IRA recommendation would be assessed.
Read the worked answer
Disclosure content (plain language, delivered before the recommendation):
'If you proceed, I will receive a one-time payment of 26,040 USD, which is 4.2% of the 620,000 USD invested, and an ongoing payment of about 5,580 USD a year (0.9%). I will also share a 0.5% referral fee with the accountant who introduced you. These payments come from the product, not as a separate bill to you, and they reduce the amount that works for you. Alternatives I can implement pay me less or nothing. You do not have to follow my recommendation.' Include a comparison of the alternatives and their costs.
Suitability assessment would test:
- Need - documented income need and legacy goal versus the annuity's payout, caps and death benefit.
- Liquidity - surrender schedule against a 79-year-old's possible care costs; a 7-year surrender period would run to age 86.
- Cost and complexity - compare the internal cost of the annuity with a low-cost income portfolio and quantify the drag over 10 years.
- Tax - note explicitly that no additional deferral is gained inside an IRA, so this reason cannot justify the switch.
- Alternatives - bond ladder, short-duration bond funds, a simple systematic withdrawal, or leaving the IRA unchanged.
The outcome must be a written, signed rationale. If the analysis does not support the sale, Daniel declines regardless of the client's or manager's preference.