Fukushima Entrance English study materials
Fukushima Entrance English study resources

Fukushima Entrance English: Writing (Composition): Position, Support, and Control

Fukushima Entrance English · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Writing (Composition): Position, Support, and Control

Writing (Composition) asks you to produce a short, coherent English text, not a list of memorized sentences. Fukushima Entrance English composition tasks reward a clear position, relevant support, and control of basic sentence structure. The reader should be able to state your main idea after one reading.

Core rules

  • Answer the prompt exactly. Underline the task word: describe, explain, agree/disagree, or give advice. A good essay on the wrong task scores poorly.
  • State a thesis in the first two sentences. For opinion prompts, take one side even if you mention the other.
  • Use two developed reasons, each with a concrete example or consequence. One reason with detail beats three reasons without support.
  • Link paragraphs with meaning, not decoration: 'For example', 'As a result', 'However' must show a real relationship.
  • Control the sentence you can finish. Short correct sentences outscore long broken ones; check subject-verb agreement and articles last.

Worked example

Prompt: Should high school students have part-time jobs? Weak: 'I think part-time jobs are good. Many students work. It is good experience.' Stronger: 'High school students should be allowed to have part-time jobs because work teaches responsibility that classrooms cannot easily replicate. For example, a student who must arrive on time and handle customers learns to manage commitments. However, schools should limit working hours so study time is protected.'

Reasoning: The stronger version has a thesis, one developed reason, an example, and a qualification. It does not list unrelated ideas. The qualification shows control without weakening the position.

Traps

  • Copying a memorized template that does not answer the prompt.
  • Giving a list of reasons with no example.
  • Using advanced vocabulary incorrectly; one wrong collocation can distort meaning.
  • Forgetting a conclusion that restates the position.
  • Ignoring the expected length and writing either a fragment or an overlong response.