Hiroshima Entrance English study materials
Hiroshima Entrance English study resources

Vocabulary in Context: Three Substitution Failures

Hiroshima Entrance English · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Vocabulary in Context: Three Substitution Failures

Kenta is working through the vocabulary-in-context section of a past paper. Three items have already cost him six minutes, and he has written a reason for each choice.

Item 1: 'The committee's report does not sustain the claim that the bridge is safe.' He chose (a) continue, arguing that a report 'continues' a claim and that the sentence 'sounds grammatical when I say it'.

Item 2: 'Few volunteers were prepared for the sheer scale of the task.' He chose (c) transparent, because a dictionary lists 'sheer' as meaning thin and see-through.

Item 3: 'The mayor drew a sharp distinction between the city's duty and its inclination.' He chose (b) a clear difference, explaining that 'distinction' means 'difference', so the safest option is whichever one contains that word.

The instructions read: 'Choose the word or phrase closest in meaning to the underlined expression as it is used in the sentence.' His teacher has given him two tests for any substitution: it must fit the grammar, and it must leave the sentence's meaning unchanged. He has ten minutes left for the remaining nine items.

1. Which of Kenta's three answers are correct, and which test does each wrong answer fail?

Read the worked answer

Two are wrong; one is right for the wrong reason.

  • Item 1 - wrong. 'Sustain' here means support, uphold ('does not support the claim'). 'Continue' passes the grammar test and fails the meaning test: a report that continues a claim is not a report that backs it. Rule: grammatical fit is necessary, never sufficient.
  • Item 2 - wrong. Before an abstract noun, 'sheer' is an intensifier: sheer scale, sheer luck, sheer nonsense. 'Transparent' is a genuine sense of 'sheer', but it needs a physical, see-through object. This is the dictionary-sense trap: a listed meaning that the partner noun forbids.
  • Item 3 - correct answer, unsafe reasoning. 'A clear difference' is right: draw a distinction = to treat two things as different. But 'any option containing difference is safest' is not a test; the distractor 'a precise line' also carries the idea of separation. What decides it is the collocation draw a distinction plus the intensifier 'sharp', not the noun 'difference'.

Score: 1 out of 3, and the method rather than the vocabulary is what failed.

2. Give Kenta a three-step procedure he can run in about twenty seconds per item.

Read the worked answer
  1. Read the whole sentence, not the underlined word. Meaning lives in the frame: sustain a claim, sustain an injury, sustain growth are three different verbs spelled the same way.
  2. Substitute and read back at normal speed. 'The report does not continue the claim' is grammatical and semantically odd; that oddness is the signal. Reading back is what turns a passive recognition into a check.
  3. Check the partner words. Ask what noun follows or precedes. Sheer + scale / luck / nonsense; draw + distinction / conclusion / attention; sustain + claim / injury / loss. Fixed partners reject senses that dictionaries still list.

Time budget: with ten minutes for nine items he can afford about forty seconds each plus a two-minute return pass. Any item that survives one substitution read with two plausible options should be flagged and left, not solved on the spot. Kenta spent six minutes on three items; the flag-and-return rule alone would have recovered most of that.

3. Which of Kenta's three mistakes is most likely to recur under pressure, and what should he do about that one specifically?

Read the worked answer

Item 2, the dictionary-sense trap. Bilingual dictionaries list senses roughly by frequency, and 'sheer = thin, transparent' appears early, so under time pressure the first listed sense arrives before any contextual check. Kenta did not invent the meaning; he retrieved a real one and failed to ask whether the surrounding noun could support it.

The fix is targeted, not general: keep a short personal list headed 'words I know wrongly' - words where his first-learned sense is not the exam's usual one. Typical entries for this exam: sustain, address, issue, figure, appreciate, assume, subject to, anything but, in terms of. For each, record one collocation that pins the exam sense: sustain a claim, address a problem, figure out, appreciate that.

Reviewing that list takes four minutes and attacks errors he actually makes, which is worth more than another twenty minutes of unsorted vocabulary drilling.