Snow Country at the Fork
Tokura is a fictional town of 7,800 on the Sea of Japan coast, down from 12,400 in 1985. Forty-one percent of residents are 65 or older; the only hospital lost its obstetrics ward in 2019. Winter snowfall averages 2.4 m, and the fishing cooperative's fleet has fallen from 68 boats to 31, mostly skippers over 60. A new expressway interchange opens next year, cutting the drive to the prefectural capital to 70 minutes, but the JR branch line is scheduled to close in 2028. Before 2020, farm-stay inns hosted 9,000 visitors a year, mostly from Taiwan and Hong Kong; numbers fell to 1,200 in 2021 and have recovered to 5,500. The town assembly must choose between two plans. Plan A: subsidize a 200-room resort hotel and a casino feasibility study with ¥4.2 billion in public money. Plan B: spend ¥1.1 billion on a compact elderly-care and childcare hub, a shared fish-processing and direct-sales facility, and fiber-optic service for remote workers. The prefecture will fund only one.
1. Using only the data in the setup, compare the two plans against three criteria a shrinking municipality should use. Which plan fits better, and what does the comparison not tell you?
Read the worked answer
Three criteria: (1) cost per resident and risk to the fiscal base; (2) fit with existing assets and skills; (3) resilience to external shocks. Plan B costs ¥1.1bn, about ¥141,000 per resident, versus ¥4.2bn, about ¥538,000, for Plan A. Plan B builds on the fishing cooperative and the farm-stay demand that already exists, and fiber can also support telemedicine and schooling. Plan A bets on a 200-room hotel and a casino study; the visitor data show 5,500 farm-stay visitors, not a mass-market base, and snowfall plus a closing rail line raise operating costs. The comparison does not tell us whether an operator will commit private capital, the age structure of future visitors, whether fiber can be installed on time, or the opportunity cost of ¥1.1bn against elderly care. It also cannot tell us whether either plan reverses outmigration; both may only slow decline.
2. Suppose the town chooses Plan B. Identify one demographic mechanism and one economic mechanism that could undermine it within ten years, and propose one indicator for each.
Read the worked answer
Demographic mechanism: the fishing workforce is already old; without successors, the processing facility could open with too few boats. Economic mechanism: remote work depends on workers choosing a snow-country town; if the expressway mainly lets residents commute out, spending may leak to the capital. Indicators: (1) number of fishing licenses transferred to successors under 50; (2) net migration of 25–44-year-olds and school enrollment; (3) share of remote-worker income spent locally, measured by a simple survey. The first two are available from town records; the third requires a new survey.
3. A council member argues that the expressway interchange makes Plan A clearly superior. Evaluate this claim using the concept of accessibility and the town's visitor data.
Read the worked answer
Accessibility is not the same as demand. The expressway cuts drive time to 70 minutes, which may increase day trips, but a 200-room resort needs overnight stays. The farm-stay data show 9,000 visitors before 2020, mostly from Taiwan and Hong Kong, and only 5,500 now; a casino study is not a market. The council member also ignores induced costs: snow removal, staff housing, and a rail closure that reduces carless access. The claim would be stronger if there were signed operator commitments and evidence that visitors stay overnight rather than pass through.