Four Undated Documents in a Matsusaka Family Archive
A family in Matsusaka, Mie Prefecture, donates a box of papers to the city museum. None of the four documents chosen for display has a date on its face. The curator's notes read:
A. A village headman (名主) reports the price of rice in silver and the village's expected yield in koku. No prefecture is named.
B. A land certificate (地券) issued after a national survey. The owner must pay land tax in money, not in rice. The paper names a prefecture and a numbered plot.
C. A record of the first general election held under a new law: 'men of 25 and over, without regard to tax paid.' It lists three candidates and 412 ballots.
D. A polling-station record from a national election in which women voted. A note in the margin refers to 'the new Constitution' and to voting at 20.
The curator must hang them in chronological order with one line of evidence under each. She also wants the wall text to answer a visitor's question: 'Did ordinary people in this region gain a voice only after 1945?'
1. Put the four documents in chronological order and give the decisive clue in each.
Read the worked answer
A → B → C → D.
A (Tokugawa period, before 1868). Clues: the title 名主, yield measured in koku, rice priced in silver, and no prefecture - domains had not yet been replaced by prefectures. A money price for rice does not make it modern; tax was still assessed on the harvest.
B (1870s). The 地券 came out of the land-tax reform begun in 1873: land is surveyed, given a number, and taxed in cash on assessed value. Both the certificate and the cash payment place it after A.
C (1928–1945). 'Men of 25 and over, without regard to tax paid' is the franchise of the 1925 General Election Law, first used in the 1928 general election. The removal of the tax condition is the decisive detail - earlier elections had a tax qualification.
D (1946 onward). Women voting, 'the new Constitution' and a voting age of 20 all point to the 1946 general election.
The order rests on internal features (titles, units, who may vote), not on handwriting or guesses - which is what a curator must be able to defend.
2. Between document B and document D, what changed for this family as landowners and as voters? What does the comparison suggest about what the state wanted?
Read the worked answer
As landowners: under B the family paid a fixed cash tax on the assessed value of its land. The state's income no longer rose automatically with a good harvest, so the risk moved to the household. A bad year still meant the same payment, which pushed farmers toward cash crops or borrowing - the pressure behind the later split between owners and tenants. Around A, payment had followed the harvest itself.
As voters: at the time of B only men meeting a tax qualification voted; C extended the vote to all men aged 25 and over in 1928; D added women and lowered the age to 20 in 1946. The direction is one of widening, but in three separate steps across 70 years, not one.
What the state wanted: first revenue it could plan on (B) and a population it could count, tax and conscript; political voice came later, and largely because people organised to demand it. The documents show a state building a uniform, cash-based relationship with its subjects before it allowed them a share in choosing it.
3. A visitor says: 'Document D shows that people here only became democratic in 1946.' Evaluate that statement.
Read the worked answer
It overstates the break. By C, all men aged 25 and over already voted, and village and town assemblies existed long before that. Saying democracy 'began' in 1946 erases the 1920s–30s parties, unions and tenant movements.
It also understates how limited the earlier participation was. Before 1945 there was no woman's vote, the colonial territories were not represented as equal citizens, and the 治安維持法 plus police powers meant an election result could not remove the government's core. The 1928 election was followed by mass arrests of left-wing activists. So the ballot existed, but it could not change who governed.
What actually changed in D: the set of people counted as full members of the political community - women, and 20-year-olds - plus a constitution that made the legislature supreme. That is a change in who counts and in what a vote can do, not the invention of voting.
Defensible wording: 'Universal suffrage for men arrived in 1928; the 1946 election extended it to women and made it effective.' Both halves of that sentence need evidence, which is exactly what the display should supply.