Third-Party Access to a Sealed Family Court File
A court clerk receives a written request from a journalist for access to a family court case file involving a 16-year-old. The file contains a psychological report, a school record, a settlement agreement, and a list of the minor's medications. The journalist argues that the case has generated public interest because the minor is a local athlete. The clerk's cousin works for the newspaper and has asked the clerk to help with the request. The presiding judge is on leave. The clerk must decide what to release, whether to redact, and how to record the decision. The court's written policy says that case records are available to parties and their representatives, and that third-party access requires judicial permission after balancing privacy and public interest. The clerk has 3 business days to respond.
1. What should the clerk release, and on what basis?
Read the worked answer
The written policy controls: third-party access requires judicial permission after balancing. The clerk should not release the file unilaterally, and the judge's leave is not a reason to grant access by default. The clerk should prepare a redaction proposal: release the fact of the case and the procedural outcome if public, but withhold the psychological report, school record, medication list, and identifying details of the minor. The public-interest argument based on the minor's local athletic status is weak because it goes to curiosity, not to the fairness of the proceeding. The clerk should refer the request to the judge or duty judge with a written summary, and if the judge is unavailable, follow the court's emergency procedure rather than deciding alone. The response should state that access was considered under the policy and identify any material released.
2. How should the clerk handle the cousin's request?
Read the worked answer
The cousin's request creates an apparent conflict. The clerk should not discuss the file, should not accept the cousin's characterization of the public interest, and should disclose the relationship to a supervisor and to the judge handling the access request. The clerk should be screened from the decision and should not handle the newspaper's request. Document the disclosure and the screening. Even if the clerk believes they can be impartial, the appearance of favoritism undermines the court's record-management integrity and may breach confidentiality rules. If the court has a conflict-of-interest form, file it promptly. The clerk should also avoid any informal contact with the cousin about the case after the request is logged.
3. What record should be made of the access decision?
Read the worked answer
The record should include the written request, the date received, the clerk's conflict disclosure, the judge's direction, the redaction log identifying each withheld item and the reason, the final response letter, and the date sent. If access is granted in part, keep a copy of the released version. The record should be retained with the case file and in the access-request log. The clerk should not place the journalist's request or the cousin's messages in the public file. The redaction log is important because it shows that the balancing test was applied item by item, not as a blanket denial. If the judge directs release, record the precise scope and any conditions.