The 80th Birthday: A Delayed Table and a Prawn on an Allergen Dish
The Terrace is a 90-seat hotel restaurant. A family of eight has booked the corner table for 19:30 to celebrate a grandmother's 80th birthday. The booking note records that one guest is severely allergic to shellfish and another is vegetarian. At 19:55 the party is still standing in the lobby because the previous guests have not left the table; they are seated at 20:10. At 20:35 seven mains arrive. The vegetarian order went into the POS without the 'no fish sauce' note and is sent back. At 20:50 the shellfish-allergic guest's soup arrives with two prawns on it. The waiter had been told 'mixed seafood soup' and the kitchen never saw the allergy note. The guest spots the prawns before eating any. The grandmother is now upset, and the father says he will post about it online and wants the entire bill cancelled. The bill to date is KES 34,600.
1. Sequence your immediate actions in the first ten minutes, in order, and explain why each action sits where it does.
Read the worked answer
Order is set by severity, not by politeness.
- Remove the prawn soup from the table at once - take the bowl and the ticket away; do not let it be pushed aside and left in front of the guest. Confirm, explicitly, whether the guest has eaten any prawn or drunk from the spoon. Ask directly about tingling lips, swelling, breathing, rash.
- If any symptom is present, treat it as a medical emergency: first-aider, antihistamine only if it is the guest's own and they ask, and call for an ambulance on any breathing or throat symptom. Do not wait to see if it settles.
- Check every other plate on the table for shellfish and for cross-contact, and cancel the vegetarian dish that is being remade so it arrives with the rest of the food.
- Apologise plainly and specifically to the whole table: 'The soup should never have come out with prawns. That is our mistake and I am sorry.' No 'but', no explanation of the POS in the first sentence.
- Remake the vegetarian main and get it out within 10 minutes, hand-delivered, confirmed by the chef.
- Manager to the table - the server apologises, the manager owns the recovery and the decision on the bill.
Why this order: an allergen exposure can kill within minutes, so it outranks everything. Re-plating the vegetarian dish next keeps the table eating together, which is what the grandmother actually cares about. Compensation comes fourth because a discount offered before the food is fixed reads as a bribe.
2. How would you handle the father's demand to cancel the entire bill? Set out the principle you would use to decide the compensation, and give a concrete offer with reasons.
Read the worked answer
Principle Compensation should match the failure and its impact, not the total bill. Two things went wrong: a 40-minute seating delay and a returned main (service failure), and a potentially life-threatening allergen error (safety failure). The safety failure is the serious one, so the gesture must be substantial and offered before it is demanded - but wiping out KES 34,600 for food and drink that was otherwise delivered and eaten is not proportionate and teaches the team the wrong lesson.
Concrete offer at the table
- Remove the soup and the returned vegetarian main from the bill.
- Complimentary dessert with a birthday plate for the grandmother, and a round of drinks or a bottle of wine while the mains are eaten.
- A discount on the food total, not the whole bill - 20–25% of food is defensible for a delay plus a remake.
- Written apology from the restaurant manager within 24 hours, with a specific invitation to return as guests of the house.
On the review threat Do not make the offer conditional on them not posting - that converts an apology into a transaction and, if it surfaces, does far more damage. Say instead: 'You are right to be angry and I would rather fix it here than have you leave with it.'
Authority: know the manager's discretionary limit before you go to the table. If the ask exceeds it, say you will confirm and come back within five minutes rather than arguing at the table.
3. What would you change to prevent a repeat of the allergen failure, and who must be informed tonight before service ends?
Read the worked answer
The failure chain, and the fix for each link
- Booking note → POS: allergy must be a mandatory, flagged field on the reservation, not a free-text note in a book nobody reads.
- POS → kitchen: the allergy must print as a bold 'ALLERGEN ALERT - TABLE 12' on the docket, and the dish must be entered as a modified line, never as the standard item with a verbal message.
- Kitchen → pass: a named person checks every allergen dish against the original ticket before it leaves.
- Pass → table: the manager or a designated runner delivers allergy dishes and names the guest.
- Pre-service briefing: at 17:00, read out the day's allergies and their table numbers.
- Allergen matrix in the kitchen listing which dishes contain shellfish, fish sauce, nuts, gluten and dairy, reviewed whenever the menu changes.
Who to inform tonight
- The executive chef and F&B manager immediately, so the kitchen is briefed while the shift is still running.
- The duty manager, who signs the incident report - allergen near-miss, no injury, full timeline.
- The restaurant manager, and the reservation system note for any future booking by this family.
- The handover log for the breakfast shift, so nobody repeats the error tomorrow.
Follow-up: a call or email to the guest within 48 hours, and a documented review within a week. A near-miss is free information; the next one may not be a near-miss.