KDF Cadet Aptitude study materials
KDF Cadet Aptitude study resources

0230: Vehicle Fails to Stop at the Perimeter Checkpoint

KDF Cadet Aptitude · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

0230: Vehicle Fails to Stop at the Perimeter Checkpoint

It is 0230 at a two-man checkpoint 300 m from a perimeter fence and 150 m from a fuel point. Light rain, no moon, and a workshop generator running. A single-cab pickup approaches from the east at an estimated 60 km/h on a road with a 40 km/h limit, headlights on full beam. There is a dip 40 m before the barrier, and vehicles sometimes emerge from it fast. Soldier A steps out, raises a torch and signals the vehicle to stop. It does not slow. Soldier B is behind a concrete block 20 m to the side with a rifle. Behind the checkpoint are 14 sleeping soldiers in a tent and the fuel point. Radio contact with the guardroom is intermittent. Twelve seconds later the vehicle is 60 m away and still accelerating, with the horn sounding continuously. At the same time a woman on foot is seen running along the fence line away from the checkpoint; she does not respond to a shouted challenge.

1. Set out the options available in the next few seconds, in order, and explain what makes each step proportionate or disproportionate given what is behind the checkpoint.

Read the worked answer

Frame the threat correctly first. The threat is a fast-moving mass of metal, not yet an identified hostile. The horn and speed are equally consistent with a medical emergency, a drunk driver, or a panicked civilian as with an attack. What is certain is the physics: at 60 km/h the vehicle covers about 17 m per second, so there are roughly three to four seconds before impact.

Ladder, in order:

  1. Barrier and light. Drop or hold the barrier, keep the torch on the driver's window, and shout a clear challenge in Kiswahili and English ('Simama! Stop!'). Cheap, fast, no risk.
  2. Get off the road line. Soldier A must move behind cover - standing in front of an accelerating vehicle is not courage, it is a casualty. Force is useless if the soldier is struck first.
  3. Warning shot - only with conditions met. A warning shot is justified only if the round goes somewhere safe. Here it does not automatically: 14 soldiers are in a tent and a fuel point is 150 m away. A round fired into the berm, angled down and away from both, may be defensible; a round fired over the vehicle's roof towards the camp is not. If no safe backstop exists, the warning shot must be skipped, not fired hopefully.
  4. Disable the vehicle, not the people. If the vehicle will breach the barrier and the post is endangered, aimed fire at the tyres or engine block is the proportionate step, accepting that a ricochet in rain and darkness is a real risk to the tent. Firing into the cab is justified only on a positive identification of a lethal threat - a weapon, a likely vehicle-borne device, or continued attack after the vehicle stops.

Key judgement. The presence of the fuel point and the tent constrains the means available; it does not give permission for a wild response. If nothing safe can be fired, the correct answer is to take cover, let the vehicle pass, and fight the problem on the ground with the guardroom alerted.

2. What should be done about the woman on the footpath, given that only two soldiers are present and a vehicle is closing?

Read the worked answer

Priority test. A running figure is not a threat until something makes her one. The vehicle is a moving hazard measured in seconds; she is an unresolved observation. Splitting a two-man team during a vehicle incident is how posts get overrun.

Immediate action. Nobody leaves the checkpoint. Soldier A, once behind cover, gives one clear challenge from cover and shines a light; if she keeps running away, that is information, not a reason to pursue. Both soldiers keep eyes on their arcs.

Record what is actually known: time, direction (along the fence, heading away), clothing, approximate height and build, whether she carried anything, which side of the fence she was on. Belief is not evidence; 'she seemed suspicious' belongs nowhere in a report.

Consider the alternatives honestly. She may be a civilian fleeing the checkpoint because armed soldiers frighten her - a common and rational response. She may be a diversion timed to the vehicle. She may be a service member late for duty. The response to all three is the same: log, challenge, report, do not chase.

Follow-up. Pass the description to the guardroom and to the patrol that sweeps the fence line at first light. If the fence has a gap where she passed, that is a serious finding for the next 24 hours, worth more than catching one person in the dark.

3. The vehicle finally stops 5 m short of the barrier after a tyre is struck; the driver is uninjured but hysterical, and a sick child is in the passenger seat. What must the commander record, and why does the record matter more than the outcome?

Read the worked answer

Immediate handling. First aid and medical evacuation for the child take precedence over everything else; the checkpoint's job now is to save the casualty it may have helped delay. Then: secure the weapon, account for every round fired, and treat the driver as a person in distress rather than a suspect until facts say otherwise. Take a brief statement while memory is fresh, separately from the soldiers.

The record must capture:

  • Time of the challenge, the warning, and each round fired, to the minute.
  • Distance estimates at each step (60 m, 40 m, barrier).
  • Exact words of the challenge, and the language used.
  • Where each round was aimed and where it struck.
  • Why the warning shot was fired or deliberately not fired, including the tent and fuel point.
  • Injuries and treatment given.
  • Names of witnesses, including the passenger.

Why the record matters more than the outcome. The outcome here was fortunate. A record that says 'he wouldn't stop so we fired' invites the conclusion that soldiers shot at a father rushing a sick child to hospital. A record that says 'challenged twice in Kiswahili and English at 60 m, no safe backstop for a warning shot because of the tent at bearing X, engaged tyres at 25 m, ceased fire when the vehicle stopped, first aid commenced at 0236' demonstrates a disciplined decision chain that a board of inquiry, a coroner, or a court martial can follow.

Lesson for training. Every incident is also a standing-order test. If the standing orders do not clearly say where a warning shot may safely be fired at this checkpoint, that gap should be closed before the next night, not after the next casualty.