The Knife in Block C: Force, Negotiation and the Incident Log
At a medium-security station with an authorised capacity of 600 and a current population of 1,020, Block C houses 210 men in eight dormitories. At 06:40, during the morning unlock, a convicted inmate serving four years for robbery with violence refuses to be counted and holds a kitchen knife to the throat of another inmate. He demands an immediate transfer and a phone call to his lawyer. Only two officers are on the block, one a recruit with six months' service, and the officer-in-charge is at the district hospital. The second-in-command proposes sending in six officers to overpower him. The armed response unit is 25 minutes away, there is no CCTV in the dormitory and only one working radio. About 40 other inmates are watching from the corridor, and the block has known gang affiliations.
1. What should the officers on the block and the acting officer-in-charge do in the first 30 minutes? Separate the decisions that cannot wait from those that must not be rushed.
Read the worked answer
Contain before you confront.
- The two officers should not enter. Lock down the other seven dormitories, clear and lock the corridor so the onlookers cannot become participants, and keep one officer at the dormitory door with continuous visual contact and a running radio commentary.
- Call the officer-in-charge (OIC) or acting OIC at once. The OIC, not the second-in-command, authorises entry. Request the armed/rapid response unit and put the sub-county police on standby in case the weapon or the situation escalates.
- Stage a first-aider, stretcher and vehicle at the gate and brief the driver.
Negotiate while preparing.
- One trained communicator, one voice, the inmate's name, calm and slow speech. Ask what he wants and repeat it back. Both demands can be passed up the chain: a transfer request can be received in writing for processing, and a lawyer call can be facilitated by the OIC under supervision. Do not promise outcomes that cannot be delivered; credibility collapses the moment a promise fails.
- Review the use-of-force option every 10 to 15 minutes rather than deciding once. Entry into a confined dormitory with benches, glass and 200 potential bystanders is high risk to the hostage and becomes justified only when the threat to life is immediate and negotiation has stalled.
Do not storm yet. The second-in-command's plan would put a six-month recruit at the front. Force is the last option and should be planned with surprise, numbers, shields, a designated arrest team and medical cover.
2. The second-in-command argues that the inmate has already committed an offence by holding a weapon, so force is justified. Set out the lawful threshold for force, who may authorise it, and what you would instruct the officers on the block.
Read the worked answer
Force is not a punishment for the offence. It is permitted only for a lawful immediate purpose: protecting life, preventing escape, preventing serious injury, or restoring order where lesser means have failed. The fact that the inmate has already committed offences (weapon possession, hostage-taking, assault) is dealt with afterwards through the disciplinary and criminal processes. It does not lower the threshold for force now.
Legal anchors to state plainly. Article 25(a) of the Constitution makes freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment non-derogable; Article 29 protects security of the person. The Prisons Act, Standing Orders and the Persons Deprived of Liberty Act permit only force that is necessary and proportionate. Under the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force, force must be the minimum necessary, and firearms may be used only against an imminent threat of death or serious injury.
Authorisation. The OIC or acting OIC authorises any planned entry and records the decision in the incident log where time allows. A senior officer present may act in an emergency and must report immediately afterwards. An unlawful order must be refused, and a recruit must never be ordered to do what an experienced officer would not do.
Instruction to the two officers: keep back, observe, report, do not engage, and do not use force merely to make him drop the knife; record times and words. If the hostage's life becomes at immediate risk, they may act to protect life using the minimum force available and must report at once.
3. The incident ends after 50 minutes with the hostage released and the assailant restrained by the response team. What are your post-incident duties in the first 24 hours, and what should change to stop a repeat?
Read the worked answer
Immediate (0 to 6 hours). Both inmates go to the health officer for examination and documented injuries (body map, photographs, P3 form if assault is alleged); treat the hostage first. Move the assailant to a single cell as segregation for safety, not punishment, with a written reason and a review within 24 hours. Secure the knife, the scene and the witnesses; take statements from both officers and at least three inmates separately before they confer.
Report (24 hours). Incident report to the regional commander and headquarters; use-of-force register entry only if force was used, never back-dated; criminal report to the police for the weapon and hostage-taking with the file; notification to the Visiting Committee; a written note on the delay in the OIC attending.
Prevention. The kitchen knife is the root cause, so apply tool control: shadow board, signed issue and return, and a count at every shift change. Add two-officer unlock, repair the radio dead spots, extend CCTV to the corridor, and use intelligence on gang tension. Refresher training in negotiation and control-and-restraint, a debrief for the recruit and welfare support are also needed. Brief the population calmly the same day to prevent rumour turning into a disturbance.