The Controlled Delivery Without Prior Approval
At 02:15 the duty prosecutor receives a call from an operational unit of the State Committee for National Security. Officers have stopped a truck carrying 12 kilograms of heroin near the Toktogul road. To identify the receiver, they propose a controlled delivery to a warehouse in Bishkek. The operation began at 01:00 without the prosecutor's written authorization; the unit says the truck driver agreed to cooperate and delay would have allowed the receiver to flee. No court order was obtained. The officers ask the prosecutor to 'approve the operation retroactively' and to authorize a covert audio recording in the warehouse. The prosecutor knows the case may later rely on the drugs and recordings. The unit has not provided the initial operational-search report or the driver's written consent.
1. Assess the legality of the controlled delivery and the request for retroactive approval.
Read the worked answer
Retroactive 'approval' is legally dangerous. Operational-search measures must be authorized by the competent official or court before they are carried out, unless the law provides a specific urgency exception with immediate written notification and later review. The prosecutor should not sign a document that treats the already-started controlled delivery as if it had been authorized. The prosecutor must first obtain the initial report, the driver's written consent, the time log, and the legal basis. The lawful part of the operation should be separated from the unlawful part. If the controlled delivery required prior prosecutor authorization, the failure is a procedural violation; the drugs may still be physical evidence, but admissibility and the integrity of the chain of custody will be challenged. The prosecutor should document the violation and decide whether to continue, stop, or refer for disciplinary review.
2. Can the prosecutor authorize the covert audio recording in the warehouse?
Read the worked answer
Covert audio recording in a warehouse can intrude on privacy and may require court authorization depending on the place and persons. The prosecutor should not authorize it merely because the operational unit asks. The prosecutor must identify the legal basis, the scope, the duration, and the safeguards. If urgency permits prosecutor authorization, it must be in writing and limited; if court authorization is required, the unit must apply to the court. The recording must be sealed, logged, and transferred under chain-of-custody rules. The prosecutor should also ensure that the driver's consent is voluntary and documented, and that the operation does not create an offence that would not otherwise occur.
3. What supervision steps should the prosecutor take next?
Read the worked answer
Supervision steps: demand a full written report; verify the legal basis and time of each step; check the driver's consent and safety; review the chain of custody for the 12 kilograms; determine whether the failure was an isolated error or a pattern; order preservation of all logs and recordings; and consider disciplinary or criminal liability for unauthorized operational-search activity. The prosecutor should give written instructions to the unit and, if necessary, refer the matter to a higher prosecutor. The prosecutor should not rely on the operation's success to excuse the illegality.