Beneficial Ownership Behind a Nominee and Family Trust
Hanbit Trading Co., Ltd., a Korean importer of consumer electronics, applies to open a won account at a commercial bank. Its shareholder register shows 40% held by Silverline Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong), 35% by Korean CEO Park Min-su, and 25% by an employee stock association. Silverline's Hong Kong business registration lists a BVI company, Northstar Ventures, as its sole shareholder; Northstar's share certificate is held by a Hong Kong nominee company for 'the Lee family trust'. The customer's representative says no natural person owns 25% or more and provides only a one-page ownership chart. Proposed first-year turnover is KRW 8 billion, but the 2023 tax return shows KRW 2.1 billion. The customer wants remittances to Vietnam and Hong Kong within five days. The branch manager, under quarterly target pressure, asks compliance whether the file can be approved with beneficial ownership marked 'not applicable'.
1. Can the bank accept the customer's statement that no natural person owns 25% or more and mark beneficial ownership as 'not applicable'? Explain the analysis.
Read the worked answer
No. The 25% figure is an identification trigger, not a safe harbour. Silverline's sole shareholder is a BVI company whose shares are held by a nominee for a trust, so the bank must look through the layered entities and the nominee/trust arrangement to find the natural persons who ultimately own or control Hanbit. Control can arise through trust powers, nominee agreements, shareholder agreements, or the CEO's actual influence even without 25% equity. If no natural person can be identified after documented reasonable efforts, the bank should identify the senior managing official and apply enhanced due diligence; it should not record 'not applicable' while a nominee and trust obscure the chain. The KRW 8 billion projected turnover against a KRW 2.1 billion tax return, plus rapid Vietnam/Hong Kong remittances, raises the risk rating. The branch manager's target pressure is irrelevant to the CDD decision. The file should remain pending until the trust deed, nominee disclosure, and a full ownership chart are obtained.
2. What enhanced due diligence and approval steps should the bank complete before onboarding?
Read the worked answer
The bank should obtain the trust deed and identify the settlor, trustees, protector, and beneficiaries; obtain the nominee's written disclosure of the principal and any indemnity arrangements; and obtain certified corporate documents for Silverline and Northstar. It should verify the source of funds for the proposed remittances and the source of wealth of the ultimate controllers, reconcile the KRW 8 billion projected turnover with the tax return and audited accounts, conduct adverse media and sanctions screening on all individuals and entities, and consider a site visit or independent corporate registry checks. Because the structure is complex and cross-border, the bank should apply EDD, assign at least high risk, and require senior management approval before onboarding. Ongoing monitoring should include lower transaction thresholds and periodic refresh of the ownership chain. If the customer refuses or gives inconsistent explanations, the bank should decline the relationship and consider an STR.
3. If the customer refuses to provide the trust deed and nominee information, what should the bank do and what reports, if any, are required?
Read the worked answer
The bank cannot complete CDD and must not open the account. It should document the refusal, the unanswered questions, and the specific inconsistencies, then decline or exit the relationship in line with its escalation policy. A refusal to provide beneficial ownership information is itself a red flag, especially with a nominee/trust structure and turnover inconsistent with tax filings. The bank should assess whether the circumstances give reasonable grounds to suspect criminal proceeds or terrorist financing; if so, it must file an STR with the Korean FIU without delay under the Specific Financial Information Act. It must not tell the customer that an STR was filed or that the refusal triggered one. The compliance officer should retain onboarding records for the statutory period and consider whether the attempted remittances to Vietnam and Hong Kong warrant a separate suspicious-transaction assessment.